University-industry linkages in developing countries: perceived effect on innovation

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess the perceptions of both universities and the resource-extractive companies on the influence of university-industry linkages (UILs) on innovation in a developing country. Design/methodology/approach A total of 404 respondents were interviewed. Descriptive analysis and multinomial logistic regression models were applied to analyse the data. Findings The findings revealed significant differences between the three informant groups across the three main groups of linkage activities. The industry informants consider all three groups of UILs important for enhancing innovation, in terms of bringing student closer to the industry. The faculty members consider consultancy and research arrangements more important than collaboration, in training and educational activities. The student perceptions on all UIL activities were relatively weak on UIL activities as a vehicle to improve innovation. Research limitations/implications Based on the findings, it seems that the universities should take advantage of a positive attitude among industrial actors and intensify efforts to develop UILs. Practical implications The research can be used for sharpen international oil companies effort towards universities in petroleum rich developing countries. Social implications Implications for policymakers and universities in developing countries, and for the local industrial base. In a broad sense the UIL stimulated innovation has implications on poverty reduction in natural resource-rich host countries. Originality/value Research on UILs in developing countries is rare, particularly in a context in which international companies are faced with host country expectations and legal requirements to invest in knowledge sector and local industry.

Competencies of Engineering Graduates: What are the Employer’s Expectations?

“…This issue becomes a challenge to universities to provide standard curriculum in order to produce graduates who are multi-skilled and implicates to the curriculum and the factors supporting the career development of students. In order to achieve both benefits to universities and industries, a collaboration between them should be reorganized (26)(27)(28). An interrelated relation between academic researcher, university and industry has to be built.…”

The changing roles of a multinational enterprise's subsidiaries and headquarters in innovation transfer: A network perspective

“…However, our results also indicate a role of universities which is different than that described in the literature. In each case, universities were crucial because they provided skilled human resources and not because they were partners in research and development projects conducted by subsidiaries, which is usually underlined in the literature (e.g., Govind & Küttim, ; Vaaland & Ishengoma, ). Therefore, the results of our study enable a new role of universities involved in successful innovation transfer taking place within MNEs to be identified.…”

“…Furthermore, the involvement of suppliers in an MNE's innovation transfer can result in the MNE's increased productivity and effectiveness (Jean, Chiou, & Sinkovics, 2016), which is caused by co-creation of production capabilities, help in identifying new customers and supporting the MNE with technical assistance, training and information, which can led to the successful creation and adoption of innovation (Winter & Lasch, 2016). Universities, together with other research institutions, are seen as crucial by Vaaland and Ishengoma (2016) in the process of innovation transfer within MNEs. They help to develop new technologies, implement them in the MNE business model, and act as an important partner in conducting R&D activity (Arvanitis & Woerter, 2009).…”

“…However, our results also indicate a role of universities which is different than that described in the literature. In each case, universities were crucial because they provided skilled human resources and not because they were partners in research and development projects conducted by subsidiaries, which is usually underlined in the literature (e.g., Govind & Küttim, 2016;Vaaland & Ishengoma, 2016). Therefore, the results of our study An important outcome is the identification of the significant role of a sister subsidiary, which can either act similarly to the focal subsidiary and support it with knowledge and expertise during the producing, developing and using parts of successful innovation transfer, or be more similar to the HQ and provide contact with external customers in the using part of innovation.…”

Criteria for Sustainable Curriculum of TVET Teacher Education Programme in Malaysia

“…According to Bohne, Eicker, & Haseloff (2017), TVET-based curriculum design has to be one that reflects a multidisciplinary approach in connection with the working process. TVET is closely related to the world of work, and this work based approach for TVET as mentioned by previous research constitutes the apprenticeship curriculum (Deissinger & Gonon, 2016;Fjellström & Kristmansson, 2016) as well as the re-skilling and up-skilling of teachers (Vaaland & Ishengoma, 2016). Therefore, it is uncommon to group academic and TVET teachers under the same basket.…”