2018
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1483326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

University teachers’ conceptions of their current and ideal intermediate assessment: an A+ is good, but speaking your mind is better

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although being prominent (40 propositions), the improvement purposes were likely to be framed in terms of the increased grades of students in the report book, rather than development and expansion of thinking and understanding (Day et al, 2018; Postareff et al, 2012), as teachers expressed that their daily assessments recorded any emerging evidence of student learning and behaviour which were then converted into grades. Nevertheless, unlike teachers in England (Hargreaves, 2005), instead of using these scores to inform and guide further learning, the scores were mainly used as the principal aspect of any final grading e.g., to report to parents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although being prominent (40 propositions), the improvement purposes were likely to be framed in terms of the increased grades of students in the report book, rather than development and expansion of thinking and understanding (Day et al, 2018; Postareff et al, 2012), as teachers expressed that their daily assessments recorded any emerging evidence of student learning and behaviour which were then converted into grades. Nevertheless, unlike teachers in England (Hargreaves, 2005), instead of using these scores to inform and guide further learning, the scores were mainly used as the principal aspect of any final grading e.g., to report to parents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Postareff et al (2012) identified a continuum of categories of assessment conceptions between reproductive and transformational purposes. Whilst reproductive conceptions focus on measuring the extent to which students remember factual information, understand, and apply the content of the learning materials, transformational conceptions place a prominent emphasis on the development of students' thinking in higher levels of cognitive processing (analyzing, evaluating, and creating) (Day et al, 2018; Postareff et al, 2012). Again, a mixed reproductive and transformational conception exists within this continuum (Day et al, 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students' performance in final assessments often exhibits a strong correlation with engagement levels, demographics, and achieved results in ongoing assessments [10,18,28]. Previous studies have analyzed limited factors such as age/gender and investigated their impacts on academic performance [3,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%