University technology transfer office business models: One size does not fit all

Open Innovation with Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping for Modeling the Barriers of University Technology Transfer: A Philippine Scenario

“…Shen [25] implied that universities are entitled to play the significant role of generating and disseminating knowledge in innovation systems to contribute to economic growth. The implementation of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 enabled the promotion of inventions and technologies developed from universities towards commercialization in pursuing their entrepreneurial intentions [8][9][10][11]. Consequently, today, the university's focus is not only on traditional goals (i.e., teaching, research) but also on technology transfer [13,14].…”

“…For instance, technology transfer has been at the forefront of the international development agenda for climate change mitigation, as well as in global climate negotiations, since technological capabilities are crucial in dealing with climate change issues [1,7]. With the implementation of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, there is an increased interest from universities in participating collaboration processes, such as technology transfer, to pursue its entrepreneurship and commercialization intentions [8][9][10][11]. This participation draws strengthened collaboration between firms with expertise in market relations and universities' scientific knowledge to create valuable technologies and innovations [12].…”

“…Battaglia et al [15] pointed out that university technology transfer (UTT) plays an essential role in bringing innovative technologies to a higher level of economic advancement due to the large amount of knowledge creation by universities. Universities can create positive impacts, while at the same time, pursuing their commercialization intentions through UTT [10]. Moreover, scientific knowledge, as the result of the collaboration between university and industry, also creates and maintains positive effects on the innovation performance of industry-science relations [16].…”

Models, Processes, and Roles of Universities in Technology Transfer Management: A Systematic Review

“…Traditional TT practices are flawed on the grounds of their over-simplicity (Bradley et al 2013), and they rarely factor in informal TT (Link et al 2007). Newer models generally allow for ideas to be theorised and practically implemented only in a specific country (setting), especially given that "one method truly does not suit all regions" (Baglieri et al 2018). In reviewing the articles for current models, processes and roles, the following groupings are recognised;…”

A vállalkozó egyetem fogalmi tere. Elméleti keretek és gyakorlati kérdések

“…egyre több kritika éri a hagyományos egyetemi modelleket, hogy nem képesek lépést tartani a világot jelenleg formáló környezeti, társadalmi, gazdasági és technológiai folyamatokkal. Ha az oktatás oldaláról nézzük ezt, akkor a képzések jövőorientációjának hiánya merül fel (Arvanitakis-Hornsby [2016], Aoun [2017], Davidson [2017], Kosslyn és szerzőtársai [2017]), kutatási oldalról pedig az, hogy sok egyetemi kutatás eredménye nem hasznosul a társadalmi, gazdasági térben (Weiss [1979], Stehr [2001], Marginson [2014]). bár azzal, hogy az egyetemeknek változniuk kell, az érintettek nagy része általában egyetért, arról azonban, hogy mi is legyen a változások iránya, és ki legyen, aki meghatározza ezeket az irányokat, már erősen megoszlanak a vélemények.…”