2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2017.405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unlabeled Samples Generated by GAN Improve the Person Re-identification Baseline in Vitro

Abstract: The main contribution of this paper is a simple semisupervised pipeline that only uses the original training set without collecting extra data. It is challenging in 1) how to obtain more training data only from the training set and 2) how to use the newly generated data. In this work, the generative adversarial network (GAN) is used to generate unlabeled samples. We propose the label smoothing regularization for outliers (LSRO). This method assigns a uniform label distribution to the unlabeled images, which re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
1,446
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,831 publications
(1,452 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
1,446
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to no existing re-id datasets for the proposed scenario, we introduced three ICS re-id benchmarks. We simulated the ICS identity annotation process on three existing large person re-id datasets, Market-1501 (Zheng et al, 2015), DukeMTMC-reID (Ristani et al, 2016;Zheng et al, 2017) and MSMT17 (Wei et al, 2018). Specifically, for the training data of each dataset, we independently perturbed the original identity labels for every individual camera view, and ensured that the same class labels of any pair of different camera views correspond to two unique persons (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to no existing re-id datasets for the proposed scenario, we introduced three ICS re-id benchmarks. We simulated the ICS identity annotation process on three existing large person re-id datasets, Market-1501 (Zheng et al, 2015), DukeMTMC-reID (Ristani et al, 2016;Zheng et al, 2017) and MSMT17 (Wei et al, 2018). Specifically, for the training data of each dataset, we independently perturbed the original identity labels for every individual camera view, and ensured that the same class labels of any pair of different camera views correspond to two unique persons (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DukeMTMC-reID dataset [47] is a subset of the DukeMTMC dataset [22]. It contains 1812 identities captured by 8 cameras.…”
Section: Datasets and Implementation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It contains 1812 identities captured by 8 cameras. Using the evaluation protocol specified in [47], we obtain 2228 query images, 16522 training images and 17661 gallery images.…”
Section: Datasets and Implementation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, supervised learning frameworks comprising of CNNs have been used for re-ID because of their ability to capture semantic and spatial information [8], [9], [21]- [23]. Broadly, the methods can be divided into two categories: deep representation learning and deep metric learning.…”
Section: A Person Re-idmentioning
confidence: 99%