2008
DOI: 10.1504/ijtm.2008.018062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unlearning as a driver of sustainable change and innovation: three Australian case studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
111
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
111
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the case study are in line with previous studies, which emphasize the impact of an individual's frame of reference upon the propensity to change (e.g. Oreg, 2003;Becker, 2008). However, the case study extends these findings that mainly relate to the individual level.…”
Section: Partnering Development and Unlearningsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the case study are in line with previous studies, which emphasize the impact of an individual's frame of reference upon the propensity to change (e.g. Oreg, 2003;Becker, 2008). However, the case study extends these findings that mainly relate to the individual level.…”
Section: Partnering Development and Unlearningsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Although the concept of unlearning is given limited attention in scholarly literature compared to the opposed concept of learning (Tsang and Zahra, 2008), since the seminal work of Hedberg (1981) it has been acknowledged that previous knowledge potentially impacts upon learning processes and therefore unlearning is a necessary precondition for the inclusion of new information and behaviour (Becker, 2008). The results of the case study are in line with previous studies, which emphasize the impact of an individual's frame of reference upon the propensity to change (e.g.…”
Section: Partnering Development and Unlearningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, researchers and practitioners face pressure to answer how ICT has to be implemented in SMEs to outperform traditional work practices. In this sense, learning and unlearning are important for change and innovation in organizations (Becker, 2008) because, as suggested by Rebernik and Sirec (2007), the better a firm understands the process of creating new knowledge and discarding obsolete knowledge, the more likely the firm will be to develop innovation behaviour. OL in the form of accumulated knowledge from past experiences and from stakeholders (customers, suppliers, business partners, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would therefore appear reasonable to propose that the acquisition of new knowledge that requires the individual to eliminate (forget, unlearn) existing knowledge is influenced by the knowledge previously acquired by the individual. In this vein, Becker (2008) argues that "the level of experience and tacit knowledge amassed by the individual had the potential to impact unlearning." Becker (2008) further proposes that those with a breadth of knowledge and experience are more likely to be open to unlearn; however, those with a depth of expertise (e.g., older practitioners), particularly in the area requiring change, are more likely to resist unlearning.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this vein, Becker (2008) argues that "the level of experience and tacit knowledge amassed by the individual had the potential to impact unlearning." Becker (2008) further proposes that those with a breadth of knowledge and experience are more likely to be open to unlearn; however, those with a depth of expertise (e.g., older practitioners), particularly in the area requiring change, are more likely to resist unlearning. If we accept this argument then it is reasonable to infer that an HHU will be unable to (or find it very challenging to) change its procedures and routines if it has not previously supported the revision and updating the existing knowledge and knowledge structures of individual practitioners involved with the HHU.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%