2015
DOI: 10.18733/c3xw25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Unlearning Privileges’: Interrupting Pre-Service Teachers Deficit Thinking of Immigrant Students with Origins in the South

Abstract: Drawing from critical and postcolonial theoretical perspectives, this paper demonstrates how a teacher educator has implemented some experiential strategies in order to encourage pre-service teachers to challenge their largely unexamined, deficit thinking regarding their English as an Additional Language (EAL) students. Teacher educators preparing teachers to work effectively and equitably in a linguistically, culturally and racially diverse context can employ teaching strategies described in this paper.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…higher order concerns versus lower order concerns. This finding is quite promising because in second language acquisition (SLA) literature, EAL writers have been seen from a deficit-oriented perspective (Guo, 2015;Marshall, 2012;Tangen & Spooner-Lane, 2008). Postsecondary teachers might stereotypically assume that all EAL writers' work will have grammatical errors and that the written products might not be as good as the work produced by native English-speaking students.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…higher order concerns versus lower order concerns. This finding is quite promising because in second language acquisition (SLA) literature, EAL writers have been seen from a deficit-oriented perspective (Guo, 2015;Marshall, 2012;Tangen & Spooner-Lane, 2008). Postsecondary teachers might stereotypically assume that all EAL writers' work will have grammatical errors and that the written products might not be as good as the work produced by native English-speaking students.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%