1977
DOI: 10.1016/0040-4020(77)84085-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unlimited non-linear selectivity effects in systems of independent parallel reactions as a basis for new chemical separation techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This has lead to a new strategy termed parallel kinetic resolution [3] (PKR; Scheme 1). The concept of such a strategy is not new, in fact, the theoretical data [4] have been available for many years. It has been shown that the selectivity factor s can be significantly lower for a parallel resolution than for a traditional kinetic resolution to acheive the same result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has lead to a new strategy termed parallel kinetic resolution [3] (PKR; Scheme 1). The concept of such a strategy is not new, in fact, the theoretical data [4] have been available for many years. It has been shown that the selectivity factor s can be significantly lower for a parallel resolution than for a traditional kinetic resolution to acheive the same result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] Treatment of (rac)-1 with the catalyst tetrakis(4S-methoxycarbonyl-2-oxyoxazolidinyl)dirhodium(ii) ([Rh 2 (4S-MEOX) 4 ], (S)-2) gave the tricyclic ketone (1S,2R,6S)-3 in 40 % yield with an enantiomeric excess of 94 %. Surprisingly, the fate of the other enantiomer (R)-1 is accounted for by the by-product 2-cyclohexenone (4), which was formed by intramolecular hydride abstraction with subsequent ketene loss.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 presents a plot of the maximum yield of initial products of a specific minimum se as a function of the selectivity.14 Significantly, processes with selectivities of 3.2, 4.3, 5.3, and 6.6 are calculated to give a 50% yield of products with an se of 80%, 90%, 95%, and 98%, respectively. 16 The potential of this type of process to enhance the stereoiso-0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10-I6These cases approach the result from a hypothetical nonstereoselective reaction (100% yield) followed by separation of the stereoisomeric products. By contrast, these cases would require the separation of nonisomeric compounds (i.e., P and B).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, however, the interactions are heteromorphic (i.e., P and Q) and, in principle, will be of different energy and occur with unequal p r~b a b i l i t~.~ A kinetically controlled reaction involving the differentiation of enantiotopic facess or enantiotopic groups where sequential reaction is prevented9 (e.g., eq. [I]) can be analyzed as a pair of mutually dependent parallel reactions (16). The ratio of products P and Q (i.e., the selectivity) is equal to the ratio of rate constants kl and kz at any point in the reaction.''…”
Section: Background and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Das Konzept dieser Strategie ist eigentlich nicht neu. So gibt es bereits seit Jahren theoretische Daten, [4] denen zufolge eine parallele kinetische Enantiomerentrennung zum gleichen Ergebnis führt wie eine herkömmliche kinetische Enantiomerentrennung, allerdings bei einem deutlich niedrigeren Selektivitätsfaktor s. So entspricht s 49 in der PKR einem Selektivitätsfaktor von 200 in der herkömmlichen Variante, in der die Produkte in 49 % Ausbeute (ausgehend von 50 %) und mit 96 % ee isoliert werden.…”
unclassified