2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unlocking information about fine magnetic particle assemblages from first-order reversal curve diagrams: Recent advances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For samples containing multiple types of magnetic minerals, more reliable methods, such as FORC diagrams, are available for inferring domain states. In our investigations, remagnetised carbonates exhibit FORCs indicating a central ridge, attributed to non-interacting single domain/PSD grains (Roberts, 2022). This interpretation is supported by our direct microscopic observations (Figures 12,13).…”
Section: Tga-qmssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For samples containing multiple types of magnetic minerals, more reliable methods, such as FORC diagrams, are available for inferring domain states. In our investigations, remagnetised carbonates exhibit FORCs indicating a central ridge, attributed to non-interacting single domain/PSD grains (Roberts, 2022). This interpretation is supported by our direct microscopic observations (Figures 12,13).…”
Section: Tga-qmssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Most of the Bambuí samples (Figure 7a') comprise an important contribution in the coercivity axis (Bc), with little contribution to the interaction axis (Bu), typical of non-interactive SD particles (Roberts et al, 2000;Roberts, 2022). Central-ridge contribution is also commonly related to the presence of biogenic magnetite, like magnetotactic bacterial magnetite in pelagic sediments (Roberts, 2011), whose sharpness is associated with little magnetostatic interactions.…”
Section: Forc Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For larger prolate and oblate particles with higher/lower ARs, NPN(P) structures form (Figures 3f and 4i). Such NPNP structures have been reported before for numerical models of FORC diagrams for vortex systems (e.g., Valdez‐Grijalva et al., 2018), however, they are usually associated with induced‐FORC (iFORC) diagrams, which are determined from transient and remanence FORC diagrams not modeled in this paper (Roberts et al., 2022; Tauxe et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2017). These NPNP structures form when there are multiple metastable intermediate states during hysteresis, for example, nucleation/de‐nucleation of vortices, or flower structures or other metastable inhomogeneous magnetic domain states, switching between intermediate local energy minima (LEM; Carvallo et al., 2003; Valdez‐Grijalva et al., 2018, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…We used FORC analysis to assess the grain size distribution of the magnetic minerals (e.g., Pike et al., 1999; Roberts et al., 2022). With their sensitivity to mineral grain size, FORC diagrams (Figure 4 and Figure S3 in Supporting Information ) show the coercivity characteristics of dominant mineral assemblages, exhibiting a dichotomy between the serpentinized and carbonated samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%