2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep28774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unlocking the bacterial and fungal communities assemblages of sugarcane microbiome

Abstract: Plant microbiome and its manipulation herald a new era for plant biotechnology with the potential to benefit sustainable crop production. However, studies evaluating the diversity, structure and impact of the microbiota in economic important crops are still rare. Here we describe a comprehensive inventory of the structure and assemblage of the bacterial and fungal communities associated with sugarcane. Our analysis identified 23,811 bacterial OTUs and an unexpected 11,727 fungal OTUs inhabiting the endophytic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
210
3
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
34
210
3
10
Order By: Relevance
“…We found differences in the fungal communities between root systems and bulk‐soil, confirming that roots provide a selective environment for microbes (Bulgarelli et al ., ; De Souza et al ., ). Strikingly, more than half of the OTUs identified inside maize roots were specific for one or the other root type (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found differences in the fungal communities between root systems and bulk‐soil, confirming that roots provide a selective environment for microbes (Bulgarelli et al ., ; De Souza et al ., ). Strikingly, more than half of the OTUs identified inside maize roots were specific for one or the other root type (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This demonstrates that maize root types influence the endophytic fungal community in a realistic field situation. Differences in bacterial and fungal communities between roots and leaves and/or stalks have been described previously for Arabidopsis and sugar cane (Bai et al ., ; De Souza et al ., ). We show that fungal communities diverge even among different parts of the same plant organ (the root system).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although contaminants can enter the process through different ways, sugarcane is the major source and new strategies based on non-cultural techniques have been applied to access microbial communities that can affect industrial processes of bioethanol production 79, 80. Besides wild yeasts, bacteria compete for sugars and nutrients with starter yeast strains causing many problems, such as inhibition of fermentation, production of organic acids, reduction of industrial yields and flocculation 81, 82, 83…”
Section: Contaminating Yeast and Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These microbes exploit the niches provided by plant hosts and form complex microbial communities (Bulgarelli et al. , 2012; Ofek-Lalzar et al , 2014; Cardinale et al , 2015; Edwards et al , 2015; Beckers et al , 2016; de Souza et al , 2016; Niu et al , 2017). Such plant-associated microbiomes are able to affect the development and health of the hosts profoundly (Berendsen et al , 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%