2014
DOI: 10.1080/0305764x.2014.970514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unlocking the gates to the peasants: are policies of ‘fairness’ or ‘inclusion’ more important for equity in higher education?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Bradley Review reinforced the notable lack of participation and achievement among equity groups in higher education in Australia when compared to the general population, despite significant policy in-roads (Edwards and McMillan 2015;Pitman 2015). The panel argued that the participation of equity groups in higher education warranted an even greater focus in future higher education strategy and policy development (Bradley et al 2008).…”
Section: Understanding the National Equity In Higher Education Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The Bradley Review reinforced the notable lack of participation and achievement among equity groups in higher education in Australia when compared to the general population, despite significant policy in-roads (Edwards and McMillan 2015;Pitman 2015). The panel argued that the participation of equity groups in higher education warranted an even greater focus in future higher education strategy and policy development (Bradley et al 2008).…”
Section: Understanding the National Equity In Higher Education Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a direct result, small incremental successes in enrolments have been noted among low SES (LSES) students across Australia over the last few years (Pitman 2015).…”
Section: Understanding the National Equity In Higher Education Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations