2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58124-4_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Mass Model Peculiarities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The perfection of the chosen scheme is characterized by functions of the airframe geometry such as the lift coefficient Cyα, drag coefficient Cxα, aerodynamic quality K, and the efficiency of the power unit, which are functions of the gas dynamic characteristics of the engine, e.g., the specific fuel consumption Cp and the relative fuel mass mt [14].…”
Section: Aircraft Shaping: Traditional Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The perfection of the chosen scheme is characterized by functions of the airframe geometry such as the lift coefficient Cyα, drag coefficient Cxα, aerodynamic quality K, and the efficiency of the power unit, which are functions of the gas dynamic characteristics of the engine, e.g., the specific fuel consumption Cp and the relative fuel mass mt [14].…”
Section: Aircraft Shaping: Traditional Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional solution to the problem of selecting rational options for design solutions at the preliminary design stage is to use empirical or approximate analytical dependencies to determine the aerodynamic and flight characteristics [14]. The same path was proposed in the works of recent years [15,16].…”
Section: Aircraft Shaping: Traditional Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations