2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-014-0842-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unmanned coaxial rotor helicopter dynamics and system parameter estimation

Abstract: A numerical model that estimates the parameters of a small, unmanned coaxial rotor helicopter with a takeoff mass of 11.9 kg was developed. The modeled coaxial rotor helicopter did not have any additional damping to its dynamics such as a stabilizer bar or external gyro, which are common in commercial hobby helicopter models. Therefore, any sinusoidal actuator input from manual flight led to a large deviation of attitude rates, resulting in uncontrollable situations. A feedback attitude controller was included… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimation as well as validation results show small inconsistencies with the experimental data because of the system's vibration and external disturbances such as wind. Figures 13 and 14 show that there are uneven fluctuations in the experimental data and slight discrepancies between experimental and simulation data, which result from sensor data-acquisition error and wind gust [21]. The developed numerical plant model does not consider wind gust or load disturbances [16] and the controller has limitations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation as well as validation results show small inconsistencies with the experimental data because of the system's vibration and external disturbances such as wind. Figures 13 and 14 show that there are uneven fluctuations in the experimental data and slight discrepancies between experimental and simulation data, which result from sensor data-acquisition error and wind gust [21]. The developed numerical plant model does not consider wind gust or load disturbances [16] and the controller has limitations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows the aerodynamic forces caused by fixed wings and special empennages, which can be calculated by Eq. (11).…”
Section: Coaxial Rotors Aerodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The navigation velocity of fixed wing type can be satisfying, but the vertical taking-off and landing (VTOL) problems cannot be solved reasonably [6,7]. The most applied rotary rotor type performs perfectly in VTOL and hovering flight [8,9], and the coaxial rotor type has been proved to afford higher loading with dual rotors based on the study of coaxial helicopters [10,11]. However, the aerodynamic coupling interference and mechanical vibration caused by rotor rotation will seriously influence the flight stability of UAVs [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The navigation velocity of fixed wing type can be satisfying, but the vertical taking-off and landing (VTOL) problems cannot be solved reasonably (Beard et al , 2005; Johnson et al , 2015). The most applied rotary rotor type performs perfectly in VTOL and hovering fight (Panagiotou and Yakinthos, 2020; Poh and Poh, 2016), and the coaxial rotor type has been proved to afford higher loading with dual rotors based on the study of coaxial helicopters (Zhang et al , 2015; Harun-Or-Rashid et al , 2014). However, the aerodynamic coupling interference and mechanical vibration caused by rotor rotation will seriously influence the fight stability of UAVs (Chattopadhyay et al , 1991; Koehl et al , 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%