2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.06.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unmatched DNA preservation prove arctic hare and sheep wool in Norse Greenlandic textile from “The Farm Beneath the Sand”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sheep bones from the Early Neolithic Period and Roman Iron Age of the Danish prehistory also fall within haplogroup B (Brandt 2014). Likewise, the DNA in the sheep wool, from a textile sample from the tenth to fifteenth century CE from Greenland, could also be assigned to haplogroup B (Sinding et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Dna Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sheep bones from the Early Neolithic Period and Roman Iron Age of the Danish prehistory also fall within haplogroup B (Brandt 2014). Likewise, the DNA in the sheep wool, from a textile sample from the tenth to fifteenth century CE from Greenland, could also be assigned to haplogroup B (Sinding et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Dna Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of archaeological wool has also been attempted with success for mtDNA, but is dependent on treatment processes and environment (Brandt et al 2011;Sinding et al 2017). Nuclear DNA has not yet been successfully retrieved from ancient textiles.…”
Section: Genetic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amplification of aDNA was chosen for a large part of the samples because of its potential high resolution, and because previous studies have demonstrated hair as an excellent substrate for aDNA preservation [ 22 , 23 , 36 , 37 ], even in one of the contexts sampled for this study [ 24 ]. Despite this, none of the analysed samples yielded endogenous aDNA, demonstrating a high degradation of endogenous DNA in the samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By providing easy access to specimens collected from temporally and spatially diverse locations, comparative collections facilitate the continued progress of research in past ecosystems. In recent years, the study of ancient biomolecules preserved in museum specimens has advanced diverse fields such as paleontology (Allentoft et al., 2014; Barnett et al., 2020), paleoecology (Lorenzen et al., 2011), archeology (Seersholm et al., 2016; Sinding et al., 2017), and anthropology significantly (Moreno‐Mayar et al., 2018; Slon et al., 2018), from large‐scale studies of migration patterns in the past (Allentoft et al., 2015) to studies of ecological changes over tens of thousands of years (Seersholm et al., 2020). However, the successful study of ancient DNA (aDNA) and proteins is greatly dependent on biomolecular preservation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%