2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.02.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unmyelinated primary afferents from adjacent spinal nerves intermingle in the spinal dorsal horn: A possible mechanism contributing to neuropathic pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both IB4 and WGA labelling produced similar results, with the central terminals of labelled afferents for both tracers arborising principally in lamina II. Although this finding is entirely consistent with previous studies where the labelling patterns of both tracers have been compared (Robertson and Grant, 1985;LaMotte et al, 1991;Kitchener et al, 1994;Wang et al, 1994;Gerke and Plenderleith, 2004;Shehab et al, 2008;Shehab, 2009) and also those reporting that C fibres terminate mainly in lamina II (Sugiura et al, 1986(Sugiura et al, , 1989Willis and Coggeshall, 1991;Ribeiro-daSilva, 2004), we have used IB4 for the main part of this study to label C-fibres selectively because (i) WGA was also shown to stain myelinated fibres as illustrated by labelling of terminals in the gracile nucleus and motor neurons in the ventral horn, and (ii) unlike WGA, IB4 does not exhibit any sign of trans-synaptic labelling (Robertson and Grant, 1985;Weinberg et al, 1990;LaMotte et al, 1991;Kitchener et al, 1993).…”
Section: Technical Issuessupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both IB4 and WGA labelling produced similar results, with the central terminals of labelled afferents for both tracers arborising principally in lamina II. Although this finding is entirely consistent with previous studies where the labelling patterns of both tracers have been compared (Robertson and Grant, 1985;LaMotte et al, 1991;Kitchener et al, 1994;Wang et al, 1994;Gerke and Plenderleith, 2004;Shehab et al, 2008;Shehab, 2009) and also those reporting that C fibres terminate mainly in lamina II (Sugiura et al, 1986(Sugiura et al, , 1989Willis and Coggeshall, 1991;Ribeiro-daSilva, 2004), we have used IB4 for the main part of this study to label C-fibres selectively because (i) WGA was also shown to stain myelinated fibres as illustrated by labelling of terminals in the gracile nucleus and motor neurons in the ventral horn, and (ii) unlike WGA, IB4 does not exhibit any sign of trans-synaptic labelling (Robertson and Grant, 1985;Weinberg et al, 1990;LaMotte et al, 1991;Kitchener et al, 1993).…”
Section: Technical Issuessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Other factors which might affect the extent of central labelling include the concentrations of tracer injected and the post-injection survival period. We routinely use both concentrations of the tracers and post-injection survival periods that are in line with many other investigators (Swett and Woolf, 1985;Valtschanoff et al, 1992;Kitchener et al, 1993;Wang et al, 1994;Tong et al, 1999;Kitao et al, 2002;Shehab et al, 2003Shehab et al, , 2004Shehab et al, , 2008Jancsó et al, 2004;Shehab, 2009). By comparing these technical parameters with those used by Liu et al (1995) which are not too dissimilar, it is difficult to explain why they failed to obtain adequate labelling with combined injections whereas we succeeded.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Workmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a proportion of afferents project in Lissauer's tract to up to two spinal segments rostrally and one spinal segment caudally. The L4 dorsal horn not only receives afferents from L4, but also from ligated L5/L6 dorsal roots (Besse et al, 1991;Shehab et al, 2008). This may contribute to the small, but statistically significant elevation of ␣ 2 ␦-1 in ipsilateral L4 after SNL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increase was observed in the superficial dorsal horn of the lumbar spinal cord. We propose that the innocuous stimuli are transmitted to a sensitized lumbar spinal cord via the intact L4 nerve, which is known to innervate multiple levels of the spinal cord (L2-L5 levels; Shehab et al, 2008). Although it is tempting to link structural plasticity, particularly that related to CGRP, a well-known sensitizing molecule, to neuropathy-induced pain hypersensitivity, we still lack extensive knowledge about this scientific niche.…”
Section: Spinal Gap-43 Expression and Nerve Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%