2014
DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2013.878352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: a review of nascent MOOC scholarship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
159
0
10

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
159
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, there is an increasing interest from lifelong learners, higher education institutions and for-profit platforms from 2012 onwards, which is also visualized in the Google trends for MOOCs (Figure 2). This pattern is quite similar to those reported by Liyanagunawardena et al (2013), Ebben and Murphy (2014), Sa'don et al (2014) and Raffaghelli et al (2015). Since 2012, MOOC pedagogy has gotten increased attention with clear indications for its big impact on lifelong learning as concluded in the consequent Innovation Reports from the Open University, UK (Sharples et al, 2012;2014).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Besides, there is an increasing interest from lifelong learners, higher education institutions and for-profit platforms from 2012 onwards, which is also visualized in the Google trends for MOOCs (Figure 2). This pattern is quite similar to those reported by Liyanagunawardena et al (2013), Ebben and Murphy (2014), Sa'don et al (2014) and Raffaghelli et al (2015). Since 2012, MOOC pedagogy has gotten increased attention with clear indications for its big impact on lifelong learning as concluded in the consequent Innovation Reports from the Open University, UK (Sharples et al, 2012;2014).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The pedagogies employed in open online courses are receiving attention (Bali, 2014;Ebben & Murphy, 2014;Margaryan, Bianco & Littlejohn, 2015;Toven-Lindsey, Rhoads & Lazano, 2015) yet only a subset of MOOCs have been used in taught paid-for courses and an even smaller subset of these have been used in online distance paid-for courses such as the one presented in this paper. Recently Fischer (2014, p.5) has noted that a 'fundamental challenge is to envision and create symbiotic relationships between MOOCs and courses at universities' and certainly the way in which the relationship is conceptualised and described will determine the role and extent to which the MOOC as a teaching approach, as a platform and as a learning tool could be useful to 'conventional' university courses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are mainly young people aged from 17 till 35 years (55% of participants of a course) which are having (75%) 5 or are getting higher education (18th %). As a rule, training is not their main occupation.…”
Section: Learner Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supporters of the optimistical point of view consider online training as the productive and meeting requirements of a modern era mechanism. A number of researches is connected with forecasts about the prospects of development of MOOK-pedagogics constructed on analytical research of already available results of training, [5]. Pessimistic moods are expressed mistrust to this way of training in general, [6] and note an undevelopment of the general pedagogical principles for mass introduction of this technology, [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%