2018
DOI: 10.1017/s002193201700061x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unpacking the Differential Impact of Family Planning Policies in China: Analysis of Parity Progression Ratios From Retrospective Birth History Data, 1971–2005

Abstract: SummaryAlthough China’s family planning programme is often referred to in the singular, most notably the One-Child policy, in reality there have been a number of different policies in place simultaneously, targeted at different sub-populations characterized by region and socioeconomic conditions. This study attempted to systematically assess the differential impact of China’s family planning programmes over the past 40 years. The contribution of Parity Progression Ratios to fertility change among different sub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, having more than one child was associated with a decrease in the odds of anemia in rural Western China in 2001 and 2005 [ 44 ]. One possible explanation for this contradictory finding could be China’s family planning program during this time, which allowed for more than one child based on sub-population characteristics, such as socioeconomic conditions [ 45 ]. Therefore, it is possible that those families who chose to have more than one child belonged to a higher socioeconomic stratum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, having more than one child was associated with a decrease in the odds of anemia in rural Western China in 2001 and 2005 [ 44 ]. One possible explanation for this contradictory finding could be China’s family planning program during this time, which allowed for more than one child based on sub-population characteristics, such as socioeconomic conditions [ 45 ]. Therefore, it is possible that those families who chose to have more than one child belonged to a higher socioeconomic stratum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the issue of old-age support in China has received increasing public attention, with a recognition that in the future, family members may be less able to provide old-age support due to the reduction in the average family size alongside increased labour migration (State Council 2013;Qin, Falkingham, and Padmadas 2018;Giles, Wang, and Zhao 2010). It is interesting to note how 'public' (or politically sanctioned) opinion regarding who (state or family) should take the responsibility of future old-age support has changed over time since the implementation of strict family planning policies in the 1980s (Chen and Xia 2013).…”
Section: Familial Community and State Old-age Support In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These individuals came 'of age' in the late 1970s just as Deng Xiaoping initiated the 'open door policy', opening up China to foreign investment and setting into motion the economic transformation of modern China (Quach and Anderson 2008). Joining the labour market during a period of rapid economic growth, this cohort also entered their prime reproductive ages alongside the implementation of the 'one child policy' (Qin, Falkingham, and Padmadas 2018). Thus this cohort is distinctive in a number of ways: they are the first cohort to enter mid-life with a high probability of having a surviving parent and thus to have had direct personal experience of being a mid-life carer; they are also the first cohort to have, on average, two or fewer children; finally, they are the first cohort who are likely to enter later life with their own pension savings, and to have adequate economic resources to fund themselves during their retirement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a recent report from the National Bureau of Statistics of PRC, in the two years following the implementation of the universal two-child policy in 2015, the number of new-born babies which were the second child increased by 1.6 million in 2017 compared with the same figure in 2016 (Li, 2018). These ‘extra’ second parity babies are not evenly distributed across the country, with many of them likely to be born to parents living in urban areas, reflecting the fact that the previous family planning policy constrained all urban couples to one child, whilst in some rural areas second and even third births were allowed (Qin et al , 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%