Limb-sparing multimodality therapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) affords excellent disease control and functional outcomes in the majority of patients.1 In a study of 4977 extremity and superficial trunk STS, 20-25 % experienced recurrence, with some recurrent events occurring more than two decades after initial treatment.
2Determining the optimal surgical approach to minimize the risk of ESTS recurrence is a complex undertaking due to extreme biologic heterogeneity, with more than 100 histologic subtypes.3 The consideration of ESTS as a single entity is a matter of necessity rather than reason. The wide range of ESTS biologic behavior makes it exceedingly difficult to define broad policies or recommendations for most management dilemmas. 4 Bonvalot et al. conducted a retrospective study of 541 ESTS patients to examine the minimum necessary margin and the issue of mandatory re-excision followed unplanned resections.5 As stated in the title, the authors also set out to examine the relationship between local control of ESTS and survival. The lack of a causal link between ESTS local control and survival has been thoroughly verified previously and, as such, will not be the focus of this editorial. 6 Among all patients, 82 % underwent R0 resection and the median margin was 2 mm. The median follow-up of 7 years allows for reasonable survival and recurrence estimates. Local recurrences (LR) were experienced by 8 % and 20 % of patients died from all causes. Predictors of worse OS were grade, leiomyosarcoma subtype, and presence of residual disease upon re-excision. Importantly, 47 % of patients were treated following unplanned excision at other hospitals; 58 % of those patients had residual disease upon re-excision. LR was predicted by specific subtypes, such as myxofibrosarcoma, and a margin less than 1 mm.The impact of residual disease, likelihood of LR occurring before death due to distant metastases, and hence importance of re-excision after unplanned ESTS resection will vary by histologic subtype. In the present study, 22 % of patients had leiomyosarcoma, a disease in which distant recurrence predominates, with only 11 % experiencing isolated LR.7 Fewer than 10 % of patients had subtypes with highly aggressive LR patterns, including myxofibrosarcoma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Whereas deferring re-excision following an unplanned lower-extremity leiomyosarcoma resection may be appropriate in selected cases given that the outcome is driven by distant recurrence, omission in a myxofibrosarcoma patient would generally be inadvisable. As acknowledged by the authors, consideration of subtype biologic behavior is a critical factor when deciding if re-excision following unplanned ESTS surgery is warranted.The goal of reoperation following unplanned ESTS resection is to eradicate potential residual disease, prevent LR, and improve the likelihood of limb salvage. The majority of unplanned ESTS resections in the present study were indeed inadequate, because 58 % of patient who underwent re-excision were fo...