Unplugged but connected [Design and implementation of a truly wireless real-time sensor/actuator interface]

Scheible, Guntram; Dzung, Dacfey; Endresen, Jan; Frey, J.-E.

doi:10.1109/mie.2007.901481

Cited by 102 publications

(55 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Since in this paper the focus is on networking technologies, the main relevant standards and industrial specifications are presented and discussed in the following sections. and ISA 100.11a [8] standards that are based partially on the IEEE 802.15.4, as well as Bluetooth [5] and WISA [9], that are based fully or partially on IEEE 802.15.1 respectively. The characteristics of each standard/solution shall be presented in this section and the pros and cons of each protocol shall be exposed with respect to the application domain characteristics and requirements.…”

Section: Domain Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, it adds advanced interference mitigation techniques to minimize interference in the harsh industrial environment and there is no need for frequency planning in case of multiple cells since the FH sequences are constructed to guarantee adequate separation between consecutive hops and low correlation. In all cases, all operating cells use the entire available ISM band of 80 MHz at 2.2GHz [9].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Wireless Sensor Network Technologies for Condition Monitoring of Industrial Assets

Giannoulis¹,

Koulamas²,

Emmanouilidis³

et al. 2013

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Systematic and robust condition monitoring of crucial equipment is the cornerstone of any successful preventive maintenance policy in the industrial environment. Recent advances in low-cost wireless sensor network (WSN) technologies and products indicate a promising future for a cost-effective, wider and more permanent deployment of a distributed sensing and processing infrastructure. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of main WSN technology alternatives available today, based on a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the typical range of requirements in the specific application domain of industrial machine condition monitoring.

show abstract

Section: Domain Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Wireless Sensor Network Technologies for Condition Monitoring of Industrial Assets

Giannoulis¹,

Koulamas²,

Emmanouilidis³

et al. 2013

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The initial results report the trigger limit performance between 6 ms and 11 ms (worst case). (Lill & Sikora, 2008), also mention a commercial alternative capable of meeting strict RT requirements, namely ABB WISA (Scheible et al, 2007). However, as a disadvantage in their case, (Lill & Sikora, 2008) report inapplicability to the battery-powered devices.…”

Section: Standardsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wireless Sensor Networks in Industrial Automation

Paavola¹,

Leiviskä²

2010

Factory Automation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…ISA100.11a is in practice very similar to WirelessHART, as both have similar design goals, but the two standards are not compatible. Furthermore, it should be noted that the WISA system (Scheible et al, 2007) is a complete solution for a reliable wireless cell in industrial manufacturing. The architecture of both industrial wireless automation standards includes sensor nodes, wireless routers communicating with each other, and a gateway, which is connected to the automation fieldbus and the rest of the automation system.…”

Section: Radios For Wireless Automationmentioning

confidence: 99%