2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1603.05178
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unramified Euler sums and Hoffman $\star$ basis

Claire Glanois

Abstract: When looking at how periods of π m 1 (P 1 {0, 1, ∞}), i.e. multiple zeta values, embeds into periods of π m 1 (P 1 {0, ±1, ∞}), i.e. Euler sums, an explicit criteria via the coaction ∆ acting on their motivic versions I comes out. In this paper, adopting this Galois descent approach, we present a new basis for the space H 1 of motivic multiple zeta values via motivic Euler sums. Up to an analytic conjecture II , we also prove that the motivic Hoffman star basisUnder a general motivic identity that we conjectur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was extended by Glanois [10,11] to the case of alternating motivic MZV's (and motivic MZV's at higher roots of unity). This again (often) allows one to recursively lift identities of real alternating MZV's to alternating motivic MZV's, by recursively verifying D <N vanishes, and using the numerical identity to fix the final unknown coefficient of ζ m (N ) via the period map.…”
Section: Recall the Coaction ∆ : Hmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This was extended by Glanois [10,11] to the case of alternating motivic MZV's (and motivic MZV's at higher roots of unity). This again (often) allows one to recursively lift identities of real alternating MZV's to alternating motivic MZV's, by recursively verifying D <N vanishes, and using the numerical identity to fix the final unknown coefficient of ζ m (N ) via the period map.…”
Section: Recall the Coaction ∆ : Hmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Now substitute in the evaluation of t({2} a ) = π 2a 2 2a (2a)! from (11), and convert the last term to a classical (non-alternating) MZV, to obtain…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. , k r ) ∈ Z if ∀k i ≥ 2, by using the motivic method employed in [7]. Also he could prove Conjecture 5.3 or Conjecture 5.2 except the 'only' parts.…”
Section: Relations Among Multiple T - T- and Zeta Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, these sums are expressible in terms of MZVs. In 2021, Murakami [18,Theorem 42] proved this conjecture by using the motivic method employed in [8] (see also [14,Remark 5.6]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%