2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling interrelationships among psychopathology symptoms, cognitive domains and insight dimensions in chronic schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same inverse relationship has been found with regard to hallucinations, disorganization, and negative symptoms. 60 However, these associations are, on the whole, weak, meaning that other factors play an important role. The only symptom dimension that correlates positively (but again, weakly) with insight is depression.…”
Section: What Is the Time Course Of Insight And Its Relationship With Psychopathology?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same inverse relationship has been found with regard to hallucinations, disorganization, and negative symptoms. 60 However, these associations are, on the whole, weak, meaning that other factors play an important role. The only symptom dimension that correlates positively (but again, weakly) with insight is depression.…”
Section: What Is the Time Course Of Insight And Its Relationship With Psychopathology?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insight in schizophrenia interacts with psychopathology symptoms in a complex way. For example, poor insight seems to be particularly associated with increased severity of positive symptoms ( Vaz et al, 2002 ; Xavier et al, 2018 ). The presence of reduced insight has been considered a state characteristic that might contribute to the phenomenology of AVHs, for example, determining the meaning of AVHs ( Waters et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After omitting it, the effect size of the remaining 89 studies was still significant ( r = 0.1696; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.141–0.198; p < 0.001; tau = 0.069; I 2 = 29.2%). The results of sensitivity analyses showed that five relevant studies (Ng et al, 2015; Önen et al, 2013; Tulacı et al, 2018; Vohs et al, 2015; Xavier et al, 2018) were the source of heterogeneity in total higher-order cognition, social cognition, and metacognition. After removing these five studies, significant correlation was still found in total high-order cognition ( k = 34; r = 0.290; 95% CI, 0.239–0.339; tau = 0.095; p < 0.001; I 2 = 38.4%), as well as social cognition ( k = 25; r = 0.258; 95% CI, 0.202–0.313; tau = 0.084; p < 0.001; I 2 = 34%) and metacognition ( k = 16; r = 0.324; 95% CI, 0.251–0.394; tau = 0.094; p < 0.001; I 2 = 34.4%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%