The oxygen evolution
reaction (OER) is central to several sustainable
energy technologies. Catalyst development has largely focused on lowering
the overpotential and eliminating reliance on precious metals, revealing
stark differences in alkaline and acidic OER. In alkaline electrolyte,
precious metal-free catalysts have approached the limiting overpotential
from established free energy scaling relationships, and our survey
of complex metal oxides shows that this limit can be approached with
a broad range of catalysts. In acidic electrolyte, electrochemical
instabilities create a dual challenge of a dearth of nonprecious metal
OER catalysts with overpotential below 0.5 V and a high dissolved
metals concentration for most precious metal-free catalysts. On device-relevant
time scales, the high dissolved metals concentrations compromise device
stability, for example, through a decrease of performance and due
to metal exchange between anode and cathode catalysts due to finite
permeability of ion exchange membranes. These considerations motivate
a substantial increase in monitoring and reporting of dissolved metals
concentrations in OER experiments. To facilitate durability-based
screening in continued catalyst discovery campaigns, we introduce
a durability descriptor based on the d-electron count
of each metal element compared to that of its Pourbaix-stable oxidation
state, which enables rapid down-selection of candidate metal oxide
catalysts. We discuss the importance of a codesign approach to catalyst
development, where a device architecture can set specific requirements
for dissolved metals concentrations and/or cathode and anode catalysts
can be designed to tolerate cross-contamination. This device-level
guidance of basic science will facilitate deployment of new catalysts
to meet the societal needs for accelerated sustainable technology
development.