We present an unbalanced compositionally-symmetric flow cell method for revealing and quantifying different mechanisms for capacity fade in redox flow batteries that are based on molecular energy storage. We utilize it, accompanied in some cases by a corresponding static-cell cycling method, to study capacity fade in cells comprising anthraquinone di-sulfonate, di-hydroxy anthraquinone, iron hexacyanide, methyl viologen, and bis-trimethylammoniopropyl viologen. In all cases the cycling capacity decay is reasonably consistent with exponential in time and is independent of the number of charge-discharge cycles imposed. By introducing pauses at various states of charge of the capacity-limiting side during cycling, we show that in some cases the temporal fade time constant is dependent on the state of charge. These observations suggest that molecular lifetime is dominated by chemical rather than electrochemical mechanisms. Growing interest in redox flow batteries (RFBs) for grid-scale energy storage has prompted development of new redox-active organic and organometallic molecules synthesized from commonly available raw materials containing earth-abundant elements such as carbon, nitrogen and oxygen. Flow batteries based upon these synthetic compounds might achieve lower electrolyte capital costs than current vanadium-based technologies without the scarcity risks associated with finite resources.1 To become a cost-effective solution for matching of intermittent renewable energy supply to demand, these flow batteries should retain most of their capacity over decadal time scales. As opposed to the elements of the periodic table, e.g. transition metals, traditionally used for the redox-active components of flow batteries, these new organic and organometallic compounds may be susceptible to molecular decomposition, leading to an additional mechanism for flow battery charge storage capacity fade.2 Typically, capacity fade in conventional flow batteries can occur through various mechanisms such as precipitation of reactant species or crossover of these species through the membrane.3,4 Some of these sources of capacity loss are theoretically reversible while others are not. Some are related to device engineering, such as electrolyte leakage, whereas others are intrinsic to the electrolyte chemistry. RFBs that rely upon electrolytes with different dissolved redox-active species on either side, such as the chromium/iron cell, suffer from irreversible crossover of these species unless their electrolytes are balanced by putting both species on both sides, thereby doubling the cost of active materials.5 a The all-vanadium RFB was developed to avoid these problems by having a single common redox-active species on both sides of the cell such that any asymmetric crossover of active species could be reversed by rebalancing the electrolytes by simple remixing. 6 Other examples of capacity fade that can be recovered by electrolyte rebalancing methods include those due to heterogeneous side reactions, such as hydrogen evolution, or fro...