Unraveling the Black Box: Exploring Usage Patterns of a Blended Treatment for Depression in a Multicenter Study

Abstract

Background Blended treatments, combining digital components with face-to-face (FTF) therapy, are starting to find their way into mental health care. Knowledge on how blended treatments should be set up is, however, still limited. To further explore and optimize blended treatment protocols, it is important to obtain a full picture of what actually happens during treatments when applied in routine mental health care. Objective The aims of this study were to gain insight into the usage of the different components of a blended cognitive behavioral therapy (bCBT) for depression and reflect on actual engagement as compared with intended application, compare bCBT usage between primary and specialized care, and explore different usage patterns. Methods Data used were collected from participants of the European Comparative Effectiveness Research on Internet-Based Depression Treatment project, a European multisite randomized controlled trial comparing bCBT with regular care for depression. Patients were recruited in primary and specialized routine mental health care settings between February 2015 and December 2017. Analyses were performed on the group of participants allocated to the bCBT condition who made use of the Moodbuster platform and for whom data from all blended components were available (n=200). Included patients were from Germany, Poland, the Netherlands, and France; 64.5% (129/200) were female and the average age was 42 years (range 18-74 years). Results Overall, there was a large variability in the usage of the blended treatment. A clear distinction between care settings was observed, with longer treatment duration and more FTF sessions in specialized care and a more active and intensive usage of the Web-based component by the patients in primary care. Of the patients who started the bCBT, 89.5% (179/200) also continued with this treatment format. Treatment preference, educational level, and the number of comorbid disorders were associated with bCBT engagement. Conclusions Blended treatments can be applied to a group of patients being treated for depression in routine mental health care. Rather than striving for an optimal blend, a more personalized blended care approach seems to be the most suitable. The next step is to gain more insight into the clinical and cost-effectiveness of blended treatments and to further facilitate uptake in routine mental health care.

Determinant Factors of Public Acceptance of Stress Management Apps: Survey Study

“…However, the lower interest in using Web-based than app-delivered self-help programs contrasts with findings from an Australian study by Batterham and Calear [62]. A possible explanation is that our study was conducted in an environment where eHealth or mHealth availability in German routine care—and thus adoption—is still in an earlier stage than in other European countries such as Sweden (eg, [116-118]). In contrast, mHealth apps can be downloaded by everyone and used outside of health care.…”

Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review

“…Other demographic variables associated with user engagement were as follows: (1) employment status, with people who worked full time more likely to use the intervention than people who were retired [ 66 ] or unemployed [ 54 , 68 ]; (2) education, with participants with higher education reporting more acceptance of interventions than people with lower education (a high school diploma or lower) [ 74 - 76 ]; and (3) housing situation, with people who were experiencing homelessness responding less to messages sent by a phone intervention compared with individuals with stable housing [ 55 ].…”

Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of PSYCHOnlineTHERAPY: Study Protocol of a Multicenter Blended Outpatient Psychotherapy Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial for Patients With Depressive and Anxiety Disorders

“…Blended psychotherapy, i.e., the combination of online intervention elements with standard psychotherapeutic care, is a rather new field of research (19)(20)(21)(22). Recent surveys and qualitative studies amongst psychotherapists indicate that blended therapy approaches would be acceptable considering perceived advantages over conventional psychotherapy, including e.g., bridging distances, flexibility, patient empowerment, and therapist support by standardized materials (17,18,23,24).…”