2023
DOI: 10.1039/d3cp00419h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling the effects of inter-site Hubbard interactions in spinel Li-ion cathode materials

Abstract: Accurate first-principles predictions of the structural, electronic, magnetic, and electrochemical properties of cathode materials can be key in the design of novel efficient Li-ion batteries. Spinel-type cathode materials Li$_x$Mn$_2$O$_4$ and...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By doing so, we obtain structural parameters that are optimized using PBEsol+U and PBEsol+U +V using the respective self-consistent Hubbard parameters and that are listed in Table I. This methodology has demonstrated its efficacy in yielding accurate results for various transition-metal compounds [73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80]. The computed values of the Hubbard parameters are as follows: U = 4.52 eV for Ti(3d) states within PBEsol+U and U = 5.21 eV for Ti(3d) states with intersite V values ranging from 1.17 to 1.37 eV (depending on the interatomic distance) between Ti(3d) and O(2p) states within PBEsol+U +V .…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By doing so, we obtain structural parameters that are optimized using PBEsol+U and PBEsol+U +V using the respective self-consistent Hubbard parameters and that are listed in Table I. This methodology has demonstrated its efficacy in yielding accurate results for various transition-metal compounds [73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80]. The computed values of the Hubbard parameters are as follows: U = 4.52 eV for Ti(3d) states within PBEsol+U and U = 5.21 eV for Ti(3d) states with intersite V values ranging from 1.17 to 1.37 eV (depending on the interatomic distance) between Ti(3d) and O(2p) states within PBEsol+U +V .…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have explored including ligand orbitals in the on-site Hubbard manifold, for example applying U corrections to O- p and S- p shells of TM compounds. ,, The extended DFT+ U + V framework was adopted for scenarios where hybridization plays an eminent role. This method augments DFT+ U by an intersite Hubbard V term, and so acts on combinations of projectors located on different sites, enhancing accuracy and transferability. ,, Finally, many open-shell systems require unlike-spin terms such as Hund’s J . In DFT+ U + J , these terms introduce an unlike-spin exchange correction, while also reducing the effective value of the U parameter. ,,,, It remains to be shown in how far a single-determinant method such as DFT+ U (+ J ) suffices to adequately describe compounds with a strong multireference character, but it is likely that Hubbard U and Hund’s J corrections can improve the description of approximate single-determinant solutions to multiconfigurational systems , (often obtained by breaking the symmetry).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is followed by a demonstration of the effectiveness of the approach in achieving even exotic target occupations and oxidation states. The ability of controlling oxidation states 44 46 opens the door to investigations of electron-transfer excitations 47 , compounds with mixed valence 48 50 or charge disproportionation such as skutterudites 51 58 or, e.g., LiR 2 O 4 spinels with R = ( M n , F e ) that are of interest as cathodes in batteries 59 , 60 . We then explore extensively the energy landscape in NiO, a prototype magnetic oxide, by utilizing a global minimization technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%