2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling the exhumation history of high-pressure ophiolites using magnetite (U-Th-Sm)/He thermochronometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
5
26
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possible process is thermal annealing acting over geological times and during the degassing experiments. In the former case we presume that the temperature needed to get a significant annealing is high (above 200 • C) and this is compatible with the age for the sample Rocher Blanc magnetite from the Schistes Lustrés (Western Alps) [21] (see below). During the degassing experiments, the annealing is usually negligible, although the temperature is high, due to the short dwelling time of the steps.…”
Section: Theoretical Damage Quantificationsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another possible process is thermal annealing acting over geological times and during the degassing experiments. In the former case we presume that the temperature needed to get a significant annealing is high (above 200 • C) and this is compatible with the age for the sample Rocher Blanc magnetite from the Schistes Lustrés (Western Alps) [21] (see below). During the degassing experiments, the annealing is usually negligible, although the temperature is high, due to the short dwelling time of the steps.…”
Section: Theoretical Damage Quantificationsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Due to the petrological importance of magnetite, during the last fifteen years special attention has been devoted to the development and application of the magnetite (U-Th)/He thermo-geochronology method (e.g., [17][18][19][20][21]). Knowledge of helium diffusivity in magnetite is a prerequisite for the geological interpretation of magnetite (U-Th)/He data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After peak burial between 62 and 55 Ma for LPU and LPM (Agard et al, 2002) and around 50-45 Ma for the Monviso LPL (Rubatto and Hermann, 2003;Rubatto and Angiboust, 2015;Garber et al, 2020), the four units of the Queyras-Monviso transect were exhumed from late Eocene to Miocene times (Schwartz et al, 2007(Schwartz et al, , 2020Angiboust and Glodny, 2020)…”
Section: The Queyras-monviso Traversementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible source of 3 He in minerals is 3 H produced as a result of ternary fission of U (Vorobiev et al, 1969;Halpern, 1971). This component is generally negligible for U concentrations < 10 ppm (Farley et al, 2006), but can be an important component when inclusions with high effective uranium concentrations ([eU] Shuster et al, 2006), such as apatite and zircon, are present. The kinetic energy of fissiogenic 3 H of 8.1 ± 0.2 MeV (Vorobiev et al, 1969) leads to an average ejection distance of 121 µm within magnetite and 264 µm in the soil.…”
Section: Production Of 3 He In Magnetitementioning
confidence: 99%