2023
DOI: 10.1101/gr.277694.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling the palindromic and nonpalindromic motifs of retroviral integration site sequences by statistical mixture models

Abstract: A weak palindromic nucleotide motif is the hallmark of retroviral integration site alignments. Given that the majority of target sequences are not palindromic, the current model explains the symmetry by an overlap of the nonpalindromic motif present on one of the half-site of the sequences. Here, we show that the implementation of multicomponent mixture models allows for different interpretations consistent with the existence of both palindromic and nonpalindromic submotifs in the sets of integration site sequ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Retroviral integration is not restricted to particular genomic positions and occurs genome-wide. Locally, the integration is affected by imperfect integrase preferences for DNA composition projected into a weak mixed motif at target sequences (Miklík et al 2023). Globally, the integration is affected by preferences for chromatin modifications projected into skewed genera-specific genome-wide proviral integration distribution (Mitchell et al 2004; Schröder et al 2002; Wu et al 2003; Narezkina et al 2004; LaFave et al 2014; De Ravin et al 2014; Elleder et al 2002; Derse et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retroviral integration is not restricted to particular genomic positions and occurs genome-wide. Locally, the integration is affected by imperfect integrase preferences for DNA composition projected into a weak mixed motif at target sequences (Miklík et al 2023). Globally, the integration is affected by preferences for chromatin modifications projected into skewed genera-specific genome-wide proviral integration distribution (Mitchell et al 2004; Schröder et al 2002; Wu et al 2003; Narezkina et al 2004; LaFave et al 2014; De Ravin et al 2014; Elleder et al 2002; Derse et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%