2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23997-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unravelling cytosolic delivery of cell penetrating peptides with a quantitative endosomal escape assay

Abstract: Cytosolic transport is an essential requirement but a major obstacle to efficient delivery of therapeutic peptides, proteins and nucleic acids. Current understanding of cytosolic delivery mechanisms remains limited due to a significant number of conflicting reports, which are compounded by low sensitivity and indirect assays. To resolve this, we develop a highly sensitive Split Luciferase Endosomal Escape Quantification (SLEEQ) assay to probe mechanisms of cytosolic delivery. We apply SLEEQ to evaluate the cyt… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a punctuate fluorescence was also observed in both calcein and merged images (Fig. 4A ) suggesting that nanoparticles were sequestered within endosomal/lysosomal compartments ( 36 , 37 ). Although the fluorescence intensity was lower, the nanoparticles R 0 and R 25 also presented punctuated fluorescence inside the cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, a punctuate fluorescence was also observed in both calcein and merged images (Fig. 4A ) suggesting that nanoparticles were sequestered within endosomal/lysosomal compartments ( 36 , 37 ). Although the fluorescence intensity was lower, the nanoparticles R 0 and R 25 also presented punctuated fluorescence inside the cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…mApple was recombinantly expressed and purified using a method previously reported 44 , with the variation that expression was performed in the E. coli strain B-95.ΔA 45 and eluted mApple was buffer exchanged into pH 7.4 PBS. Protein concentration was determined by A568 with e = 82,000 M -1 cm -1 27 .…”
Section: Protein Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although data are very scarce, the reported EVs endosomal escape efficacies vary from 10% after 2 h to 24.5% after 12 h in Joshi et al [72] and about 20-30% in Bonsergent et al [71] Although direct fusion with the plasma membrane is possible, it is expected to represent a much smaller fraction of intra-cytosolic delivery when looking at the delivery kinetic. These numbers are to be compared with the natural endosomal escape that is reported to be about 2-7% depending on the cell type [73], about 0.1-2% for synthetic vectors [74] and about 40-50% for viral vectors like AAVs [75].…”
Section: A Very Interesting Intra-cytosolic Rna Delivery (Endosomal Escape)mentioning
confidence: 99%