2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11160-021-09688-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unravelling fish community assembly in shallow lakes: Insights from functional and phylogenetic diversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a random pattern rather than functional clustering was observed, indicating that stochasticity and ecological drift are the primary processes regulating fish trait composition. The effects of stochastic processes on community structure have been found in previous studies on macroinvertebrates and diatoms in the Chishui River basin (Wang et al., 2020), fishes, macroinvertebrates, and macrophytes in the Yangtze River (Jia et al., 2021; Li et al., 2023; Liu & Wang, 2018) and other taxa in terrestrial landscapes (Cadotte et al., 2019; Si et al., 2017). We, therefore, upheld the idea that deterministic processes and stochasticity work together in governing fish community assembly, which only partially supported our second hypothesis (H2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, a random pattern rather than functional clustering was observed, indicating that stochasticity and ecological drift are the primary processes regulating fish trait composition. The effects of stochastic processes on community structure have been found in previous studies on macroinvertebrates and diatoms in the Chishui River basin (Wang et al., 2020), fishes, macroinvertebrates, and macrophytes in the Yangtze River (Jia et al., 2021; Li et al., 2023; Liu & Wang, 2018) and other taxa in terrestrial landscapes (Cadotte et al., 2019; Si et al., 2017). We, therefore, upheld the idea that deterministic processes and stochasticity work together in governing fish community assembly, which only partially supported our second hypothesis (H2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This could suggest that phylogenetic diversity is more reflective of changes in trait space of traits we did not measure, such as those related to phenology (Flynn et al 2011, Galland et al 2019). Thus, using phylogenetic diversity and functional richness can provide a more complete picture of community variation through space and time, despite not being proxies for one another (Pavoine and Bonsall 2011, Sobral and Cianciaruso 2016, Jia et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While functional and phylogenetic diversity indices provide more information on community diversity than taxonomic diversity alone, they are not independent (Jia et al 2021). Our results suggest that variations in FR and PD are due to gains and losses of unique species, particularly with respect to life history and abiotic niche strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the lack of a true phylogenetic tree involving all the macroinvertebrate taxa in Tibet, we employed taxonomic distance based on path lengths in the Linnean taxonomic tree as a surrogate for true phylogeny (Cardoso et al, 2015). Since the positions of species in a taxonomic tree usually mirror their positions of the topological structure in a phylogenetic tree, this method is regarded as a robust proxy, and has been widely used in phylogenetic diversity studies (Jia et al, 2021; Liu et al, 2021; Teichert et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%