2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unravelling key factors controlling vivianite formation during anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effluent SS concentration of this MBBR system was about 61 mg SS/L, which was much lower than that (i.e., 150–250 mg SS/L) of the typical MBBR process in treating domestic wastewater . A low biomass yield of this system was associated with the high COD removal efficiency of the CEPT process, and the high in situ FNA concentration in the aerobic MBBR had a strong biocidal effect on many microorganisms. , The dosed iron can also increase sludge dewaterability and reduce sludge disposal costs. , It is possible to further recover iron and phosphate in terms of a valuable product, i.e., vivianite, from anaerobically digested sludge. The produced biogas, if used for energy generation, can generate energy and meet the heat and electricity requirements of the treatment process, as evaluated previously . According to the energy balance, the proposed system could achieve energy self-sufficiency with a net energy production of 329 GJ/y in a WWTP with a treatment capacity of 10,000 m 3 /days (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The effluent SS concentration of this MBBR system was about 61 mg SS/L, which was much lower than that (i.e., 150–250 mg SS/L) of the typical MBBR process in treating domestic wastewater . A low biomass yield of this system was associated with the high COD removal efficiency of the CEPT process, and the high in situ FNA concentration in the aerobic MBBR had a strong biocidal effect on many microorganisms. , The dosed iron can also increase sludge dewaterability and reduce sludge disposal costs. , It is possible to further recover iron and phosphate in terms of a valuable product, i.e., vivianite, from anaerobically digested sludge. The produced biogas, if used for energy generation, can generate energy and meet the heat and electricity requirements of the treatment process, as evaluated previously . According to the energy balance, the proposed system could achieve energy self-sufficiency with a net energy production of 329 GJ/y in a WWTP with a treatment capacity of 10,000 m 3 /days (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Almost all of the iron remained in the digested sludge and accumulated in AnMBR, although 2.9% was present in the permeate (Figure ). In general, during AD, ferrous ions combine with PO 4 3– and S 2– to form solid particles of Fe 3 (PO 4 ) 2 and FeS, respectively. , Notably, a portion of iron and phosphorus remained in the reactor, attributed in part to the accumulation of inorganic iron and phosphorus precipitates on the membrane surface and pores. The magnetic separation of vivianite from sludge was recently reported as a promising method for phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emerging phosphorus (P) crisis calls for efficient and sustainable P-recovery from wastes/wastewater. It has been practiced to recover phosphorus from wastewater and/or waste activated sludge (WAS) (Jupp et al, 2021;Liu et al, 2021;Ma and Rosen, 2021), ranging from struvite (Hao et al, 2013) to vivianite (Hao et al, 2022b;Wijdeveld et al, 2022). However, the proper environments suitable for formation of both struvite and vivianite are relatively strict (Hao et al, 2022b(Hao et al, , 2013Prot et al, 2021), and moreover P-recovery efficiencies of struvite and vivianite are not very high, at 15-30% and 40-70%, respectively (Chrispim et al, 2019;van der Kooij et al, 2020;Wijdeveld et al, 2022;Wilfert et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been practiced to recover phosphorus from wastewater and/or waste activated sludge (WAS) (Jupp et al, 2021;Liu et al, 2021;Ma and Rosen, 2021), ranging from struvite (Hao et al, 2013) to vivianite (Hao et al, 2022b;Wijdeveld et al, 2022). However, the proper environments suitable for formation of both struvite and vivianite are relatively strict (Hao et al, 2022b(Hao et al, , 2013Prot et al, 2021), and moreover P-recovery efficiencies of struvite and vivianite are not very high, at 15-30% and 40-70%, respectively (Chrispim et al, 2019;van der Kooij et al, 2020;Wijdeveld et al, 2022;Wilfert et al, 2015). In another approach to P-recovery, WAS-incinerated ash (5-10 P% or 11-23 P 2 O 5 %) have a high potential in the P-recovery efficiency, up to 90% (Fang et al, 2020;Jupp et al, 2021;Liu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%