Unravelling the role of guanxi in the formation and management of international joint ventures – a systematic review of the literature

Abstract

Purpose The formation of international joint ventures (IJVs) is one of the prevalent approaches for Western companies to conduct business in China. Yet, doing business in China is difficult for many firms, partially because of the institutional voids that are created by weak formal institutions. The paper aims to focus on the role of guanxi (an informal institution and a company capability that fills such institutional void) in the formation and management of IJVs. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review on the role of guanxi in IJV formation and management is conducted based on papers published in top international business journals between 2005 and 2020 – in total, 47 papers are included in the review. Findings The findings of the study are presented in four themes, namely, the role of guanxi as social capital in IJV formation, the role of trust in guanxi-based IJVs, the role of control mechanisms in balancing high reliance on trust in guanxi-based IJVs and the role of guanxi in managing inconsistencies in the regulatory environment. The analysis also reveals that guanxi has a positive effect on the development of IJVs if control between the parent firms is well balanced; otherwise, guanxi can trigger opportunism and leads to failures. Practical implications The study unravels how guanxi leads to successful outcomes in IJV formation and management, which assist managers who operate IJVs with their decision-making. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no previous paper has critically analysed the literature on IJVs using a guanxi perspective at micro (personal), meso (business) and (macro) governmental levels. This approach allows for providing more nuanced view of the role of guanxi in the formation and management of IJVs and aligns more closely with managerial decision-making.

Informal institutions and the international strategy of MNEs: Effects of institutional effectiveness, convergence, and distance

“…The formal and informal systems are largely convergent because both seek to facilitate business activities and strengthen the market, but the informal rules will play a more meaningful role. For example, in China, the concept of guanxi captures a complex informal network based on mutually beneficial relationships that can facilitate business dealings (Zhao & Castka, 2021). This system can provide trust in business relationships that can help facilitate business transactions when formal institutions are not sufficiently strong (Luo, Huang, & Wang, 2012;Puffer, Mccarthy, & Boisot, 2010;Su, Yang, Zhuang, Zhou, & Dou, 2009).…”

Linking the taniwha and dragon: Māori primary exports into China and culturally aligned value chains

“…These codes of conduct and standards are then adopted across supply chains and its adherence is enforced and monitored through audits and inspections-orchestrated by the most dominant actors in supply chains (Prajogo et al, 2021). Although culture is considered as important in building relationships, for example, in long-term partnerships (Zhao & Castka, 2021), the formation and operation of individual firms and their networks are often driven by universal principles. The value chain literature has been more considerate of the role of culture.…”

“…Much has been made of the cultural affinity between Māori and Chinese business people. Most of this commentary focuses on the emphasis both cultures place on relationship building in business (Rout et al, 2021; Zhao & Castka, 2021). This is epitomised by the tourism and trade body New Zealand Story (Wixon, 2016), which explains, “when Māori do business the first order of business is not business, it is building relationships through actively finding and forging connections.…”

Supplier audits during COVID-19: a process perspective on their transformation and implications for the future

“…This study is grounded in the context of New Zealand-China food supply chains. Economically, this setting represents the most critical food supply chains for New Zealand as China is its largest overseas market for food products (Zhao and Mills, 2019;Zhao and Castka, 2021). At the same time, supplier audits in these networks also represent what can be considered as generic supplier audits at a global scale, given that New Zealand firms such as Fonterra or Zespri, and Chinese-based food producers, such as Yili Group and Supplier audits during COVID-19 Bright Dairy, are global leaders in the industry.…”