2022
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unravelling UBC 274: A morphological, kinematical, and chemical analysis of a disrupting open cluster

Abstract: Context. Open clusters in the process of disruption help to understand the formation and evolution of the Galactic disk. The wealth and homogeneity of Gaia data have led to the discovery of several open clusters with signs of disruption. Detailed chemical information for these clusters is essential in order to study the timescales and interplay between the star formation process and cluster disruption. Aims. We perform a morphological, kinematic, and chemical analysis of the disrupting cluster UBC 274 (2.5 Gyr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After merging the rough local clusters, 3,787 open clusters are finally found. Different from other works based HDBSCAN algorithm (Ye et al 2021;Casamiquela et al 2022;Tarricq et al 2022), in the present work, the e-HDBSCAN method systematically searched nearby ( b | | < 25°) all-sky regions using this algorithm. In addition, we strictly limit the number of members of open cluster candidates to be larger than 50.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After merging the rough local clusters, 3,787 open clusters are finally found. Different from other works based HDBSCAN algorithm (Ye et al 2021;Casamiquela et al 2022;Tarricq et al 2022), in the present work, the e-HDBSCAN method systematically searched nearby ( b | | < 25°) all-sky regions using this algorithm. In addition, we strictly limit the number of members of open cluster candidates to be larger than 50.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another remaining question is whether the multiplicity fractions in OCs are measurably different from the multiplicity fractions in the field (except from the well-known effects of dynamical mass segregation; e.g. Geller & Mathieu 2012;Sheikhi et al 2016;Tarricq et al 2022;Casamiquela et al 2022;Evans & Oh 2022). Parker & Goodwin (2012) showed that stochastic interactions within an OC can significantly vary the intermediateseparation multiplicity fraction by a factor of 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, their birth and death can be strongly influenced by large-scale nonaxisymmetric features in the Milky Way, such as spiral arms, as well as giant molecular clouds on a small scale (Piskunov et al 2006;Morales et al 2013;Piskunov et al 2018;Wright 2020;Anders et al 2021). Therefore, it has been proven to be important to understand the dynamical evolution and dissipation of open clusters (Bravi et al 2018;Carrera et al 2019;Tang et al 2019;Yeh et al 2019;Meingast et al 2021;Pang et al 2021;Casamiquela et al 2022) and also compare their demography to that of field stars (Soubiran et al 2018;Spina et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%