Unravelling Work Drive: A Comparison between Workaholism and Overcommitment

Abstract

Workaholism and overcommitment are often used as interchangeable constructs describing an individual’s over-involvement toward their own job. Employees with high levels in both constructs are characterized by an excessive effort and attachment to their job, with the incapability to detach from it and negative consequences in terms of poor health and job burnout. However, few studies have simultaneously measured both constructs, and their relationships are still not clear. In this study, we try to disentangle workaholism and overcommitment by comparing them with theoretically related contextual and personal antecedents, as well as their health consequences. We conducted a nonprobability mixed mode research design on 133 employees from different organizations in Italy using both self- and other-reported measures. To test our hypothesis that workaholism and overcommitment are related yet different constructs, we used partial correlations and regression analyses. The results confirm that these two constructs are related to each other, but also outline that overcommitment (and not workaholism) is uniquely related to job burnout, so that overcommitment rather than workaholism could represent the true negative aspect of work drive. Additionally, workaholism is more related to conscientiousness than overcommitment, while overcommitment shows a stronger relationship with neuroticism than workaholism. The theoretical implications are discussed.

Psychological and Physiological Stress and Burnout Among Maternity Providers in A Rural County in Kenya: Individual and Situational Predictors

“…Overcommitment to work, called 'workaholism' in some research, has been related previously to higher job stress and burnout [91] and is associated with two particular dimensions of job burnout: emotional exhaustion and depersonalization [92]. Overcommitment has also been related to a concept called 'drive,' re ecting internal pressure to work and frequent thoughts about work [93]. It has been proposed that individuals with high work drive may stretch themselves in many directions in the hope of being able to handle situations on the job.…”

An Analysis of the Relationship between the Modified Theory of Planned Behavior and Leisure Rumination of Korean Employees

“…Fourth, the affective rumination factor of leisure rumination was found to have a positive effect on the attitude and behavioral control factors of the modified theory of planned behavior. Affective rumination refers to employees experiencing a positive emotional state and mental recovery during work or in daily life through thoughts of leisure activity [ 17 , 21 , 87 , 88 ]. Moreover, this study identified that affective rumination may reduce negative emotional experiences by enabling employees to resolve work stress more actively through the pleasant recollection of leisure activities [ 4 ].…”

Quality of Life in Employee with Workaholism

“…Pitrowski and Vadanovich put forth that workaholism is developed from the integration of individual factors, such as personality traits and home and family characteristics; this includes roles, responsibilities, demanding internal and external factors (such as the appreciation of earning more money, either at home or at work, at first) [31]. Some studies explain the etiology of workaholism with personality traits such as "neuroticism", "conscientiousness", "narcissism", and "perfectionism" [32][33][34][35]. Furthermore, "obsessive-compulsion", "achievement orientation", "perfectionism", and "conscientiousness" personality traits have a strong link to workaholism.…”