2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2006.00973.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unrecognised hypoglycaemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes using the continuous glucose monitoring system: Prevalence and contributors

Abstract: Hypoglycaemia, assessed using the CGMS, is common in children with type 1 diabetes and can be prolonged (although is predominantly mild). Bedtime home glucose recordings are poorly predictive of hypoglycaemia during the following night. Continuous glucose monitoring has proven very useful in management of individual patients, particularly adolescents experiencing difficulties with adherence to diabetes management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
18
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On 23% of hypoglycemic nights, sensor glucose levels ≤60 mg/dl were present for almost 2 h and the duration of hypoglycemia was longer in those aged <25 years. It seems unlikely that the observed incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia is an overestimate because prior outpatient studies using CGM have reported even higher rates (8,9,1113), as have inpatient studies using blood glucose measurements (10,14). Although sensor inaccuracy could produce misclassification of some nights as to whether hypoglycemia occurred, an inpatient accuracy study conducted by the Diabetes Research in Children Network using the FreeStyle Navigator showed that the false-positive and false-negative rates for nocturnal hypoglycemia were approximately the same (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On 23% of hypoglycemic nights, sensor glucose levels ≤60 mg/dl were present for almost 2 h and the duration of hypoglycemia was longer in those aged <25 years. It seems unlikely that the observed incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia is an overestimate because prior outpatient studies using CGM have reported even higher rates (8,9,1113), as have inpatient studies using blood glucose measurements (10,14). Although sensor inaccuracy could produce misclassification of some nights as to whether hypoglycemia occurred, an inpatient accuracy study conducted by the Diabetes Research in Children Network using the FreeStyle Navigator showed that the false-positive and false-negative rates for nocturnal hypoglycemia were approximately the same (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Studies that used retrospective and real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems to assess glycemic control of type 1 diabetes indicate that severe hypoglycemic events are only the tip of the iceberg regarding the risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia, because many more events are unrecognized and asymptomatic (814). Detection of such events is important, however, because recurrent episodes of mild hypoglycemia have been shown to contribute to the development of defective counterregulatory hormone responses to subsequent reductions in blood glucose, thus setting the stage for clinically important hypoglycemic events.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, it could also be that certain severe conditions, which may last for many hours, including cerebral malaria, may associate clinical but difficult to detect hypoglycaemic episodes in the context of an already altered clinical status. Previous studies using the CGMs have confirmed overnight unrecognized hypoglycaemia is common among children with type 1 diabetes [39] but very little is known on the impact of recognized and unrecognized hypoglycaemia in non-diabetic children. On the other hand, fasting is considered a risk factor because it leads to glycogen depletion, which can result in decreased glucose production and hypoglycaemia [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this study confirms that CSII improved glycemic instability without reducing HbA1c, the quarterly application of CGM is not sufficient to improve overall control [44]. However, others have reported its usefulness in the management of individual patients, particularly adolescents experiencing difficulties with adherence to diabetes management and in detecting unrecognized hypoglycemia [45]. CGM can also be used to compare the effectiveness of various therapeutic strategies in research settings [46].…”
Section: The Old Technology – Holter-type Retrospective Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 89%