2018
DOI: 10.7181/acfs.2018.02047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unrecognized intraorbital wooden foreign body

Abstract: Intraorbital wooden foreign bodies may present difficulties in diagnosis due to their radiolucent nature. Delayed recognition and management can cause significant complications. We present a case report that demonstrates these problems and the sequela that can follow. A 56-year-old man presented with a 3-cm laceration in the right upper eyelid, sustained by a slipping accident. After computed tomography (CT) scanning and ophthalmology consultation, which revealed no fractures and suggested only pneumophthalmos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite repeated imaging studies during follow-up, no foreign body was detected until it was spontaneously discharged. Although the spontaneous excretion of organic foreign bodies retained in the orbit several months to several years after eyelid trauma has been reported [ 3 , 4 , 5 ], to the best of our knowledge, no case of spontaneous expulsion from the conjunctival sac has been reported. Since organic foreign bodies left in the orbital space can cause visual dysfunction and serious infections in patients, prompt surgical removal after detection is recommended [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite repeated imaging studies during follow-up, no foreign body was detected until it was spontaneously discharged. Although the spontaneous excretion of organic foreign bodies retained in the orbit several months to several years after eyelid trauma has been reported [ 3 , 4 , 5 ], to the best of our knowledge, no case of spontaneous expulsion from the conjunctival sac has been reported. Since organic foreign bodies left in the orbital space can cause visual dysfunction and serious infections in patients, prompt surgical removal after detection is recommended [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraorbital foreign bodies are commonly encountered in clinical practice. However, their diagnosis is not easy [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. The diagnosis is made through a comprehensive assessment of the medical history, clinical findings (ocular motility disorder and suppurative inflammation), and diagnostic imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and echo imaging [ 1 , 2 , 7 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In T1-weighted images (T1-WI), a wooden FB gives a more uniform signal and is more discernible as compared to T2-weighted imaging (T2-WI). The possibility of getting motion artefacts is also higher in T2-WI [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previously reported cases of wooden intraorbital foreign bodies, good outcomes were obtained through a surgical approach with the knowledge of the exact number and location of intraorbital foreign bodies [7,10]. However, surgical approaches may not be favorable if postoperative complications, such as optic nerve injury, are anticipated due to the location of the foreign body in the intraconal space being very close to the optic nerve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%