1988
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1988.01670060031011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unreliability of Self-reported Burning Tendency and Tanning Ability

Abstract: Burning and tanning histories were studied in 790 white students 18 to 30 years of age by means of a self-administered questionnaire. Only 325 cases (41.1%) were classifiable according to the Fitzpatrick scheme (skin types I to IV). Skin type I (always burn, never tan) was recorded only twice (0.3%). The minimal erythemal dose was measured in a subgroup of 197 students; these results showed no significant correlation with the self-reported burning tendency. In 508 students the burning-tanning histories were co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
72
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability to tan is central to the UVR/MS outcome hypothesis. Previous studies in patients with various diseases have shown that classifying subjects as skin types 1 or 4 is straightforward, though differentiating subjects with type 2 and 3 may be more problematic [22]. While we report an association between disability and skin type, this link was strongly determined by disease duration and gender.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…The ability to tan is central to the UVR/MS outcome hypothesis. Previous studies in patients with various diseases have shown that classifying subjects as skin types 1 or 4 is straightforward, though differentiating subjects with type 2 and 3 may be more problematic [22]. While we report an association between disability and skin type, this link was strongly determined by disease duration and gender.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…and Karlsson et al 51 . did not detect a difference in the number of CMN and in the prevalence of CAMN in relation to skin type, whereas other investigations indicated that individuals with more sun‐sensitive skin had fewer naevi 38,52–55 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This finding could result from inherent difficulties in pigmentation phenotyping, for example skin typing based on historical data, provided by the study subject, is prone to error (Rampen et al, 1988;Weinstock et al, 1991). However, some researchers have interpreted the results of these studies as suggesting the MC1R variants alter skin cancer development and/or progression through mechanisms which are independent of their effects on pigmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%