Unreliable memories and other contingencies: problems with biographical knowledge

Abstract

Gardner, Graham, (2001) 'Unreliable memories and other contingencies: problems with biographical knowledge', Qualitative Research 1(2) pp.185-204 RAE2008This article addresses two concerns that are central to much of the qualitative research currently ongoing in both the social sciences and other fields of social research: the status awarded to biographical knowledges and, associatively, how such knowledges are dealt with in concrete research. The first section calls attention to the unreliability of memory in order to cast doubt on the veracity of lay actors' accounts and thus question their position in social research. The second section, taking up this challenge, addresses a number of critical issues related to both the theoretical and the empirical status of biographical knowledges in qualitative research. Foremost of these are how both 'ignorance' and the dynamic nature of memory are integral to the construction and reconstruction of biographical knowledge. The methodological considerations that arise from this discussion are then considered more explicitly. The article seeks to provoke, rather than foreclose, critical thought and debate.Peer reviewe

The new squirearchy and emergent cultures of the new middle classes in rural areas

“…The best that can be hoped for with any research is the construction of a localized, temporary and highly contingent understanding of 'what is going on' (cf. Staeheli and Lawson, 1995;Gardner, 2001). The data it has drawn on reflects the findings of a single study in a particular time and place, whilst class formation is itself a dynamic and ongoing process.…”

Trends in qualitative research in language teaching since 2000

“…Interviews feature prominently in QR in language teaching, but there are as yet few signs that researchers have taken note of developments in the wider field, Pavlenko's (2007) excellent discussion of autobiographic narratives as data and Talmy's (2008) AAAL (American Association for Applied Linguistics) colloquium being notable exceptions. There is a growing literature on the importance of treating interviews as interactionally co-constructed events in which participant identity and positioning have significant analytical implications (Baker 1997(Baker , 2002Nijhof 1997;Rapley 2001;Cassell 2005;Roulston 2006;Wooffitt & Widdicombe 2006), while problems of memory (Gardner 2001) and misrepresentation (Sikes 2000) represent particular challenges. Yet analysis of interviews in our field still tends to treat them as reports rather than accounts, relying on unproblematised thematic analysis.…”

A Qualitative Exploration of U.K. Prisoners’ Experiences of Substance Misuse and Mental Health Difficulties, and the Breaking Free Health and Justice Interventions

“…Additionally, in this study participants were asked to reflect back on their past experiences of the associations between their mental health difficulties, substance use and offending. Such qualitative recollections of autobiographical experiences may be considered by some researchers to be unreliable and overly subjective (Gardner, 2001;Nunkoosing, 2005), although many others perceive this inherent subjectivity within qualitative approaches to be its central strength (Braun & Clarke, 2006;Neale et al, 2005).…”