1986
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860715)58:2<336::aid-cncr2820580222>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unresectable and locally recurrent rectal cancer treated with radiotherapy or bilateral internal iliac artery infusion of 5-fluorouracil

Abstract: Seventy-nine patients with histopathologically verified unresectable or locally recurrent rectal cancer were nonrandomly allocated to radiotherapy or regional intra-arterial infusion of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU). Fifteen patients with unresectable and 32 with locally recurrent rectal cancer were subjected to radiotherapy. The absorbed dose was 30 Gy in patients with an unresectable tumor and 45 Gy in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer. Six patients with unresectable and 26 with locally recurrent rectal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four prospective studies were included. Of these, two were randomized controlled trials in which the population given palliative pelvic radiotherapy served as the control group [15,16], one was non-randomized [17], and one was an observational study including patients assessed both prospectively and retrospectively, but given similar treatments [18]. The remaining 23 studies were retrospective chart reviews.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Four prospective studies were included. Of these, two were randomized controlled trials in which the population given palliative pelvic radiotherapy served as the control group [15,16], one was non-randomized [17], and one was an observational study including patients assessed both prospectively and retrospectively, but given similar treatments [18]. The remaining 23 studies were retrospective chart reviews.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies classified responders as having “complete regression of symptoms” [23,32] while two others specified best symptomatic response [16,26]. With the exception of one study [17], it remained unclear whether results reflected the best response observed during the follow-up period or the response measured at a certain time point. One study used a grading scale classifying response according to duration of palliation of symptoms rather than the degree to which the symptoms were relieved [33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although treatment for colorectal carcinoma has improved, the recurrent metastasis rate is 30-60% after complete resection of the primary tumor [2]. The five-year survival rate in patients with recurrent metastasis is around 10% and the prognosis is very poor [3,4]. Recently, instead of solely utilizing surgery to remove the tumor, comprehensive, multidisciplinary treatments, in particular, surgery combined with interventional therapies have had promising results in recurrent metastatic carcinoma [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional chemotherapy for pelvic tumours by isolated regional perfusion has been used by a variety of authors [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] since the initial description of regional perfusion by Creech 1959 [17]. Major interest developed in the 1960s when intravascular balloon catheters were utilized for the isolation of the pelvic bed during pump oxygenation perfusion of cancer chemotherapy [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%