2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdmv.2018.12.003
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unresolved questions on venous thromboembolic disease. Consensus statement of the French Society for Vascular Medicine (SFMV)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 202 publications
(248 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guidelines, even sometimes those issued in the same country, have heterogeneous recommendations. For example, in France, where the CELEST trial is conducted, one guideline recommends ECS for the prevention of PTS after DVT, and another one does not 18,21 . Differences in results for ECS efficacy for PTS prevention between studies may be due to a placebo effect or suboptimal compliance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Guidelines, even sometimes those issued in the same country, have heterogeneous recommendations. For example, in France, where the CELEST trial is conducted, one guideline recommends ECS for the prevention of PTS after DVT, and another one does not 18,21 . Differences in results for ECS efficacy for PTS prevention between studies may be due to a placebo effect or suboptimal compliance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several potential explanations as to why rigorously conducted trials report opposite results, and ECS efficacy is now debated 14 . This lack of agreement on the efficacy of ECS among experts led to several guidelines no longer recommending ECS for the prevention of PTS, leaving physicians “empty handed.” 6,15‐21 In this article, we present an overview of the published clinical trials that have assessed the efficacy of ECS in the prevention of PTS after an acute DVT and examine their limitations. We will then present the protocol of the CELEST trial (Compression Elastique Evaluation du Syndrome post Thrombotique), a multicenter double‐blind RCT comparing high‐strength (ankle pressure 35 mm Hg) versus lower‐strength (ankle pressure 25 mm Hg) ECS to prevent PTS after proximal DVT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some hematologists, as well as the SFMV, have argued for the treatment of upper extremity SVT using guidelines similar to that of the lower extremity, namely for thrombus that is greater than 5 cm in length or within 3 cm of the deep venous system. 16,18 Current Guidelines for Imaging Protocols of Upper/Lower Extremity SVT Recently published practice parameters and consensus statements for the ultrasound evaluation of VTE in the extremities produced since the publication of management guidelines do not include specific recommendations to evaluate superficial veins (Table 3).…”
Section: Management Of Upper Extremity Svtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The French and European 2019 recommendations [41] , [46] , [49] , [50] on the management of PE in non-COVID-19 patients do not recommend DVT screening in asymptomatic patients.…”
Section: Should We Screen For Dvt?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specificity of this test decreases with age, and the threshold value is adjusted by adding 10 × the number of years beyond the age of 50 years (500 ng/mL + [10 × years over fifty]). This adjustment has been validated and incorporated into updated clinical practice recommendations [46] , [49] , [50] , [51] . Given the significant increase in D-dimer levels associated with the inflammatory response in COVID-19, some authors have proposed readjusting the threshold value to 3.000 ng/mL [20] , with a sensitivity between 76.9% and 100%, a specificity between 67% and 94.9%, and a negative predictive value of 92.5% [25] .…”
Section: Should We Screen For Dvt?mentioning
confidence: 99%