2012
DOI: 10.1177/0310057x1204000219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unrestricted Access to Sugammadex: Impact on Neuromuscular Blocking Agent Choice, Reversal Practice and Associated Healthcare Costs

Abstract: Sugammadex is known to rapidly and completely reverse the effects of amino-steroidal neuromuscular blocking agents. However, the high costs of sugammadex have so far prevented its introduction as the standard reversal agent in most healthcare systems. At the Royal Perth Hospital, sugammadex was recently introduced as an unrestricted alternative to neostigmine for the reversal of amino-steroidal neuromuscular blocking agents. The aim of this retrospective observational audit was to investigate the impact of thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This shows a high acceptance rate as an alternative to neostigmine, as previously published by[13] and. [14]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shows a high acceptance rate as an alternative to neostigmine, as previously published by[13] and. [14]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ledowski and colleagues found that the cost of muscle relaxants and reversal increased from 42$ to 127$ per case after the introduction of unrestricted use of sugammadex [20]. Fuchs-Buder and colleagues assessed the feasibility of the routine use of sugammadex for reversal of rocuronium-induced NMB [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nous proposons la dose de rocuronium de 0,8 mg/ kg qui a permis dans cette observation une intubation rapide, dans d'excellentes conditions, identiques Ă  celles que procure la succinylcholine. La dose de sugammadex en fin d'intervention a Ă© tĂ© limitĂ© e Ă  2 mg/kg, ce qui reprĂ© sente une diminution intĂ© ressante du coĂ» t de cette anesthĂ© sie, dans un contexte Ă© conomique oĂč l'utilisation mĂȘme du sugammadex est sujette Ă  controverse [10], notamment du fait du surcoĂ» t qu'elle ne manque pas d'occasionner, et oĂč nous sommes encouragĂ© s Ă  utiliser les molĂ© cules de prix Ă© levĂ© avec parcimonie [11,12]. La place du sugammadex dans ce genre de pathologies paraĂźt nĂ© anmoins d'un intĂ© rĂȘt certain tant le gain en termes de sĂ© curitĂ© est Ă© vident.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified