BackgroundSugammadex reverses the effect of rocuronium more rapidly and effectively than neostigmine, at all levels of neuromuscular blockade (NMB). However, its cost is prohibitive. The combination of half dose sugammadex with neostigmine would be non-inferior to full dose sugammadex for the reversal of deep NMB. This approach would reduce the cost of sugammadex while preserving its efficacy.MethodsPatients were randomly allocated to receive sugammadex 4Â mg/kg (Group S) or sugammadex 2Â mg/kg with neostigmine 50Â ÎŒg/kg and glycopyrrolate 10Â ÎŒg/kg (Group NS) for reversal of rocuronium deep NMB. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who recovered to 90% Train of Four (TOF) ratio within 5Â min. The non-inferiority margin was set at 10%.ResultsTwenty eight patients were enrolled in each group. The number of patients who reached 90% TOF ratio within 5Â min was 27 out of 28 (96%) in group S versus 25 out of 28 (89%) in group NS by intention-to-treat (difference: 7%, 95% CI of the difference: â9% to 24%). The number of patients who reached 90% TOF ratio within 5Â min was 26 out of 26 (100%) in group S versus 23 out of 25 (92%) in group NS by per-protocol (difference: 8%, 95% CI of the difference: â6% to 25%).ConclusionsSugammadex 2Â mg/kg with neostigmine 50Â ÎŒg/kg was at worst 9% and 6% less effective than sugammadex 4Â mg/kg by intention-to-treat and by per-protocol analysis respectively. Hence, the combination is non-inferior to the recommended dose of sugammadex.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT 02375217, registered on February 11, 2015