2002
DOI: 10.1175/bams-83-12-1821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsafe at Any (Wind) Speed?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Fujita (1971) noted that vehicles can be lofted at F2, with 3 s gust wind speeds rated as 190-260 km/h (Table 2). Schmidlin et al (2002) assessed that "semi-trucks and other high profile trucks, trailers, and buses may be tipped over" at F1 wind speeds, i.e., 125-190 km/h. Thus, the current results are consistent with those of Schmidlin et al (2002), for the box truck both with and without a load.…”
Section: Test Methods and Measured Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, Fujita (1971) noted that vehicles can be lofted at F2, with 3 s gust wind speeds rated as 190-260 km/h (Table 2). Schmidlin et al (2002) assessed that "semi-trucks and other high profile trucks, trailers, and buses may be tipped over" at F1 wind speeds, i.e., 125-190 km/h. Thus, the current results are consistent with those of Schmidlin et al (2002), for the box truck both with and without a load.…”
Section: Test Methods and Measured Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schmidlin et al (2002) assessed that "semi-trucks and other high profile trucks, trailers, and buses may be tipped over" at F1 wind speeds, i.e., 125-190 km/h. Thus, the current results are consistent with those of Schmidlin et al (2002), for the box truck both with and without a load. For lofting, the wind speeds would almost certainly be higher than the 150 km/h observed overturning of the empty truck.…”
Section: Test Methods and Measured Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NOAA (2007) directs vehicle occupants to ''Get out of automobiles'' when a warning is issued and if you are in a car, ''leave it immediately.'' However, recent research shows that being in a vehicle may be less risky than being in a mobile home or outdoors during a tornado warning (Duclos and Ing 1989;Carter et al 1989;Brown et al 2002;Schmidlin et al 2002;Daley et al 2005). Therefore, driving to a shelter when a warning is issued may be a reasonable choice for mobile home residents whose shelter is more than 200 m away.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yes, when warnings include information about the potential consequences of a storm, increasing the projected impact of a warned storm increased the probability that our respondents selected some sort of protective action. Though estimates differ, most researchers agree that the risk of death or injury from a tornado is significantly higher in stationary vehicles than permanent structures, like single-family homes (Hammer and Schmidlin 2000;Schmidlin et al 2002;Wurman et al 2007;Brooks et al 2008). To explain this phenomenon, we showed that the relationship between consequence-based messaging and protective action depends (in part) on the type of action being considered.…”
Section: Discussion and Implications Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 90%