“…Figure presents the statistical values for ultimate tensile strength (UTS), modulus of elasticity, and strain at break, respectively. The UPR0, UPR50, and UPR100 formulations presented modulus of elasticity of 3.4, 3.4, and 3.9 GPa, respectively, which matched or exceeded their general-purpose commercial counterparts, which vary on average from 2 to 4 GPa, as well as other conventional formulations well established in the literature. , Formulations with aromatic and furan dicarboxylic acids used herein also allowed to obtain UPRs with a higher modulus of elasticity when compared to those UPRs based on saturated aliphatic dicarboxylic acids, such as succinic, itaconic, and adipic acid, which have been addressed in the literature. , Some other factors can also explain the higher modulus of elasticity, such as (i) high double bond content with 1:3 in mol % S/U dicarboxylic acid ratio in all formulations, providing high crosslinking density, which results in hard and inflexible cured UPRs; (ii) prepolymer synthesized from rigid structure saturated acids (PA and FDCA), which provides chains with lower flexibility when compared with polyesters based on diacids derived from natural oils; and (iii) the fact that one-third of total glycols have been ISO, also responsible for promoting greater rigidity in the backbone compared to aliphatic diols.…”