1969
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.23.1071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UnsplitK*'S

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On substituting this in the expression (6.11) for the deviation of the stress momentum energy tensor from that of the particle current reference state, due to the vorticity dependent action contribution Λ´, we see that the asymptotic form of this deviation will be expressible in terms of the fundamental tangential and normal projection tensors associated with the flux 2-surfaces [20] [21] , as given respectively by 4) and (7.5) in the form 6) in which, relative to the particle current reference state, the relevant effective vorticity pressure Π´, acting transversely to the vortex flux lines, will be given by…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On substituting this in the expression (6.11) for the deviation of the stress momentum energy tensor from that of the particle current reference state, due to the vorticity dependent action contribution Λ´, we see that the asymptotic form of this deviation will be expressible in terms of the fundamental tangential and normal projection tensors associated with the flux 2-surfaces [20] [21] , as given respectively by 4) and (7.5) in the form 6) in which, relative to the particle current reference state, the relevant effective vorticity pressure Π´, acting transversely to the vortex flux lines, will be given by…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was Lund and Regge [3] who first drew attention to the analogy between Kalb-Ramond coupled string motion in an axion field and vortex motion in an ordinary non relativistic superfluid. The immediate inspiration for the coherent relativistic theory presented here was provided by the more recent analysis of Davis and Shellard [4] [5] , and its modification to allow for more general kinds of field by Ben Ya'acov [6] [7] . The outcome effectively extends and completes the results of an earlier pionneering investigation using a different but ultimately related approach by Lebedev and Khalatnikov [8] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26][28][29][30] Different approaches exist for the development of polarizable models. [31] Normally, polarizable solvent must be combined with polarizable solute; thus, such models have also been developed for molecules resembling groups commonly found in biomolecules, such as alkanes [32] or amines. [33] Applications of polarizable force fields, so far, include ion hydration, [34,35] aqueous mixtures, [36,37] interfaces, [38] lipid bilayers, [39,40] and solvated proteins.…”
Section: Explicit Atomistic Solventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is valid for superstring amplitudes [19]. The bounds obtained above depended essentially on the restriction of the integral over super-Schottky group parameter space to a single fundamental domain of the super-modular group.…”
Section: Estimates Of Moduli Space Integrals Corresponding To Closed mentioning
confidence: 99%