2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-021-06480-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised active learning with loss prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, active learning can be roughly divided into three categories: uncertainty-based, diversity-based, and hybrid active learning algorithms [24] . Uncertainty-based [25][26] active learning selects data that is difficult to distinguish in the model for labeling, thus achieving the ability to improve the model's performance. Uncertaintybased active learning methods are easy to adapt to various tasks, but they may not perform well in extremely imbalanced sample situations due to considering only the information content of the sample itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, active learning can be roughly divided into three categories: uncertainty-based, diversity-based, and hybrid active learning algorithms [24] . Uncertainty-based [25][26] active learning selects data that is difficult to distinguish in the model for labeling, thus achieving the ability to improve the model's performance. Uncertaintybased active learning methods are easy to adapt to various tasks, but they may not perform well in extremely imbalanced sample situations due to considering only the information content of the sample itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to mention, despite considerable progresses made in the field of pavement crack detection, the deep learning method still requires a large amount of image-based labeling data for model training [8,9]. The labeling work is known to be time-consuming and laborious, and the imbalanced categorical data of the training set would result in a poorly trained model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%