2019
DOI: 10.1109/taslp.2018.2877258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised Detection of Anomalous Sound Based on Deep Learning and the Neyman–Pearson Lemma

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel optimization principle and its implementation for unsupervised anomaly detection in sound (ADS) using an autoencoder (AE). The goal of unsupervised-ADS is to detect unknown anomalous sound without training data of anomalous sound. Use of an AE as a normal model is a state-of-the-art technique for unsupervised-ADS. To decrease the false positive rate (FPR), the AE is trained to minimize the reconstruction error of normal sounds and the anomaly score is calculated as the reconstructio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One characteristic of AED task is the ratio of concerned acoustic event to the background is quite small, which is similar to the anomaly event detection task [32], [33]. The difference is that we already know the types of audio events in AED tasks [34], so we need to look for events with known features, but in anomaly event detection we have no information about the abnormal samples to be discriminated. For anomaly event detection task, [34] proposes a framework: firstly, they construct a complete set in a manifold space, then subtract the normal part from the complete set to obtain information about anomalous audio and recognize it.…”
Section: Anomaly Event Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One characteristic of AED task is the ratio of concerned acoustic event to the background is quite small, which is similar to the anomaly event detection task [32], [33]. The difference is that we already know the types of audio events in AED tasks [34], so we need to look for events with known features, but in anomaly event detection we have no information about the abnormal samples to be discriminated. For anomaly event detection task, [34] proposes a framework: firstly, they construct a complete set in a manifold space, then subtract the normal part from the complete set to obtain information about anomalous audio and recognize it.…”
Section: Anomaly Event Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference is that we already know the types of audio events in AED tasks [34], so we need to look for events with known features, but in anomaly event detection we have no information about the abnormal samples to be discriminated. For anomaly event detection task, [34] proposes a framework: firstly, they construct a complete set in a manifold space, then subtract the normal part from the complete set to obtain information about anomalous audio and recognize it. Furthermore, [35] uses the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence to measure the similarity between normal and abnormal samples according to the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) feature.…”
Section: Anomaly Event Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in the anomalous sounds also being reconstructed and having small A θ (xt). To increase A θ (xt) for anomalous sounds, we previously proposed a training method of an AE that works to increase A θ (xt) of simulated anomalous sounds by defining the anomalous sound as "non-normal" [11]. As a simplified implementation of our method [11], a mini-batch of anomalous sounds {x (a) j } Ma j=1 can be generated by adding sounds of other things (hereinafter, something-else sounds) as…”
Section: Dnn-based Unsupervised-adsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include vibration sensorbased approaches [1][2][3][4], temperature sensor-based approaches [5], and pressure sensor-based approaches [6]. Another approach is to detect anomalies from sound by using technologies for acoustic scene classification and event detection [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Remarkable advancements have been made in the classification of acoustic scenes and the detection of acoustic events, and there are many promising state-of-the-art studies in this vein [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%