2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2017.8037735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised gait detection using biomechanical restrictions

Abstract: Quantification of human gait with sensors has enormous potential in health and rehabilitation applications. Objective measurement of gait features in the home and community can reveal the true nature of impact of disease on activities of daily living or response to interventions. Previously reported gait event detection methods have achieved good success, yet can produce errors in some irregular gait patterns. In this paper, we propose a novel unsupervised detection of gait events and gait duration by combinin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Developments in algorithmic methods, particularly machine learning, have improved the potential of mobile sensor technology for analysis of gait in real-world environments [8]- [10]. Of particular interest, unsupervised machine learning algorithms for the analysis of multiple time series are being developed and tested for gait event detection [11], [12]. While these algorithms have been shown to be accurate for gait event identification in the laboratory, they have not been tested on data collected from a real-world environment, nor have they been compared to simple heuristic identifiers with minimal sensor data from the same data set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Developments in algorithmic methods, particularly machine learning, have improved the potential of mobile sensor technology for analysis of gait in real-world environments [8]- [10]. Of particular interest, unsupervised machine learning algorithms for the analysis of multiple time series are being developed and tested for gait event detection [11], [12]. While these algorithms have been shown to be accurate for gait event identification in the laboratory, they have not been tested on data collected from a real-world environment, nor have they been compared to simple heuristic identifiers with minimal sensor data from the same data set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional options for mobile sensing are inertial sensors, such as accelerometers and gyroscopes. These sensors have been utilized extensively for the identification of gait events and locomotion mode, with varying success [1], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. One of the major limitations of accelerometers regards excess vibrations experienced during initial foot contact which may limit consistency of accelerometry data when compared to gyroscopic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation