2017
DOI: 10.1364/boe.8.003081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised identification of cone photoreceptors in non-confocal adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope images

Abstract: Precise measurements of photoreceptor numerosity and spatial arrangement are promising biomarkers for the early detection of retinal pathologies and may be valuable in the evaluation of retinal therapies. Adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) is a method of imaging that corrects for aberrations of the eye to acquire high-resolution images that reveal the photoreceptor mosaic. These images are typically graded manually by experienced observers, obviating the robust, large-scale use of the techno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 1 3 Quantitative assessment of the mosaic through metrics on AO retinal images, such as cone density and spacing, has shown potential for clinical application 2 , 4 with substantial efforts already realized toward assembling normative databases. 5 12 To overcome the tedious task of manually identifying cones and to remove the variability of human graders, various automated algorithms have been developed for two types of AO modalities: confocal 13 16 and nonconfocal 17 19 AO scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO). However, most quantitative metrics have been based on representing each cone as a point.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 3 Quantitative assessment of the mosaic through metrics on AO retinal images, such as cone density and spacing, has shown potential for clinical application 2 , 4 with substantial efforts already realized toward assembling normative databases. 5 12 To overcome the tedious task of manually identifying cones and to remove the variability of human graders, various automated algorithms have been developed for two types of AO modalities: confocal 13 16 and nonconfocal 17 19 AO scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO). However, most quantitative metrics have been based on representing each cone as a point.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has already been extensive research on automating cone localisation in images of healthy retinas, with state-of-the-art algorithms obtaining similar-to-human performance 4 7 . Only recently, however, have researchers attempted to tackle the problem of automatically detecting photoreceptors in images acquired from retinas afflicted with pathologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from difficulties in accurate cone identification, the impracticality of manual image grading by observers and its poor repeatability can also render metric applications as unreliable [95]. Recent efforts to produce automated analytic tools for AO images have shown promise in both confocal and non-confocal settings [119,120], with the latter being used in achromatopsia and Stargardt disease [121,122]. Although further work is needed to characterise the performance of these algorithms in relation to different metrics [123], this AO-FIO AOSLO Canal-like foveal schisis cavities seen, with a spoke wheel pattern of inner retinal folds.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%