2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised machine learning algorithm for detecting and outlining surface waves on seismic shot gathers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the similar dispersive characteristics between guided waves and surface waves, a similar workflow (including transfer learning / re‐training of the CNN) could be used for identification of surface waves in land seismic or near‐surface DAS records (e.g. Xia et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the similar dispersive characteristics between guided waves and surface waves, a similar workflow (including transfer learning / re‐training of the CNN) could be used for identification of surface waves in land seismic or near‐surface DAS records (e.g. Xia et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify normal and abnormal geophones from their corresponding PCCs, the proposed workflow additionally takes advantage of unsupervised clustering algorithms. Data clustering algorithms have been successfully utilized in diverse geophysical applications such as signal recognition, velocity picking, seismic facies analysis, and salt‐boundary delineation (Barnes and Laughlin, 2002; Marroquín, Brault and Hart 2009a, 2009b; Zhang and Lu, 2016; Galvis et al ., 2017; Xia et al ., 2018; Di et al ., 2018; Liu et al ., 2018; Wrona et al ., 2018; Huang, 2019; Waheed et al ., 2019). In the proposed workflow, the k ‐means clustering (MacQueen, 1967) is employed to distinguish groups of PCCs, which segregate normal and abnormal geophones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%