2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2021.111551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised machine learning in fractography: Evaluation and interpretation

Abstract: Modern computer vision and machine learning techniques, when applied in Fractography bare the potential to automate much of the failure analysis process and remove human induced ambiguity or bias. Given the complex interaction between intrinsic (e.g. microstructure) and extrinsic (e.g. environment, loading history) factors leading to failure, deep learning methods, which exhibit very high efficiency in establishing complex interconnections between the input data, may end up revealing new correlations and infor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there are also some compelling approaches to microstructure segmentation using unsupervised learning [58][59][60][61][62], supervised learning is used for the most part. This makes sense, because complex microstructures in particular require the algorithm to learn more complex concepts that can no longer be distinguished by means of unsupervised learning.…”
Section: Overview Of ML Applications In Microstructure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are also some compelling approaches to microstructure segmentation using unsupervised learning [58][59][60][61][62], supervised learning is used for the most part. This makes sense, because complex microstructures in particular require the algorithm to learn more complex concepts that can no longer be distinguished by means of unsupervised learning.…”
Section: Overview Of ML Applications In Microstructure Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were able to achieve a total mean Intersection over Union (IoU) that was > 91% for two different materials. In [42], unsupervised learning [43] was employed on a clustering algorithm in order to classify SEM images based on tungsten composition achieving accuracy that was greater than 90%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, many algorithms have been employed to analyze plenty of data in materials science. [67][68][69][70] Among these algorithms, the frequency distribution statistics and unsupervised machine learning have been proved to exhibit outstanding accuracy and efficiency in narrowing the design ranges of alloys. In this work, the performances of these two algorithms were compared by selecting the composition ranges with superior microstructural stability and creep resistance, respectively.…”
Section: Unsupervised Machine Learning-assisted Alloy Designmentioning
confidence: 99%