2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised neural spike sorting for high-density microelectrode arrays with convolutive independent component analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…: Santhanam et al (2004); Vargas-Irwin & Donoghue (2007); Wood & Black (2008); Ventura (2009) ;Chah et al (2011); Bestel et al (2012); Barnett et al (2016)), but are computationally intensive, sensitive to changes in waveform due to electrode drift, and no ground truth is available. Exciting recent methods leverage high-density neural recordings to yield reliable single neuron isolation, but such sensors represent a minority of emerging technologies as they are optimized specifically for high-density recording within a small volume around a linear probe Harris et al (2016); Rossant et al (2016); Pachitariu et al (2016); Leibig et al (2016); Jun et al (2017a); Chung et al (2017). This requirement creates a trade off between spike sorting quality and measuring from a larger volume of tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: Santhanam et al (2004); Vargas-Irwin & Donoghue (2007); Wood & Black (2008); Ventura (2009) ;Chah et al (2011); Bestel et al (2012); Barnett et al (2016)), but are computationally intensive, sensitive to changes in waveform due to electrode drift, and no ground truth is available. Exciting recent methods leverage high-density neural recordings to yield reliable single neuron isolation, but such sensors represent a minority of emerging technologies as they are optimized specifically for high-density recording within a small volume around a linear probe Harris et al (2016); Rossant et al (2016); Pachitariu et al (2016); Leibig et al (2016); Jun et al (2017a); Chung et al (2017). This requirement creates a trade off between spike sorting quality and measuring from a larger volume of tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Datasets from thousands of electrodes necessitate a spike sorting algorithm that is extensively automated. Furthermore, the few algorithms that have been designed to process large-scale recordings have not been tested on data where one neuron is recorded by the large-scale recordings and simultaneously by another technique, so that the success rate of the spike sorting algorithm can be measured [Pachitariu et al, 2016, Leibig et al, 2016, Hilgen et al, 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the recordings using the CMOS-MEA were performed using CMOS MEA Tools, a software implementing the cICA algorithm (Leibig et al, 2016). Only well-isolated single units were considered (criterium: IsoBG > 5).…”
Section: Cmos-meamentioning
confidence: 99%