Proceedings of the International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedical Informatics 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2506583.2506701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised pattern discovery in human chromatin structure through genomic segmentation

Abstract: We applied a dynamic Bayesian network method that identifies joint patterns from multiple functional genomics experiments to ChIP-seq histone modification and transcription factor data, and DNaseI-seq and FAIRE-seq open chromatin readouts from the human cell line K562. In an unsupervised fashion, we identified patterns associated with transcription start sites, gene ends, enhancers, CTCF elements, and repressed regions. Software and genome browser tracks are at Author contributions M.M.H., W.S.N., and J.A.B. c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
168
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
168
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Annotation involved processing the raw data for chromatin accessibility (DNAse hypersensitivity) along with ChIP-seq data for six histone modifications (H3K4me1, H3K27me3, H3K27ac, H3K4me3, H3K36me3 and H3K9me3), followed by use of the Segway algorithm [27] to predict seven features as previously described [10]. Annotation was generated by analysing enrichment of each feature for the different chromatin tracks with a one-way proportion test performed with continuity correction of the observed vs expected proportion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annotation involved processing the raw data for chromatin accessibility (DNAse hypersensitivity) along with ChIP-seq data for six histone modifications (H3K4me1, H3K27me3, H3K27ac, H3K4me3, H3K36me3 and H3K9me3), followed by use of the Segway algorithm [27] to predict seven features as previously described [10]. Annotation was generated by analysing enrichment of each feature for the different chromatin tracks with a one-way proportion test performed with continuity correction of the observed vs expected proportion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulatory elements such as promoters, enhancers, insulators, transcribed, and repressed regions are marked by distinct patterns of histone modifications (1), including histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac), H3K27 trimethylation (H3K27me3), H3K36me3, H3K4 monomethylation (H3K4me1), H3K4me3, and the CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF). Systematic chromatin state identification has recently emerged as a powerful technique to interpret and compare regulatory landscapes within and between cell types (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7). Such methods use an unsupervised approach to identify recurrent combinations of histone modifications across the genome, thereby producing a map of representative chromatin states that are likely to be biologically relevant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ChIP is also widely used to study patterns of histone modifications and chromatin modifiers [63,76]. It can be integrated to other data sets, as with Segway [77], helping development of chromatin model [78]. ChIP coupled with quantitative real-time PCR allows the study of the dynamics of DNA and proteins interactions in living cells for up to several minutes, and has now been adapted to microfluidics technology reducing the number of cells and time required [79].…”
Section: Epigenomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%